turns-00019.parquet:57298
0db1c30389515be55e167193degenerate_repetitionAbsentFinal dense release
USER
Previous Conviction of the Accused Another rule of evidence, particularly applicable to criminal cases, does not allow anything to be said during the course of the trial as to any previous conviction recorded against the defendant, or to suggest he is of bad character, unless he himself has put his character in issue by giving evidence of good character or has attacked the character of a witness for the prosecution This rule is imposed to protect a defendant of bad character from the prejudice of a jury learning of a previous conviction. If such evidence were allowed it would tend to relieve the prosecution of its duty to prove the guilt of the defendant in respect of the specific charge for which he is on trial. For the same reason, the failure of the defendant to give evidence in his own defence should not be regarded as an indication that he is guilty. Prosecution may not normally refer to any statement by the defendant confessing his guilt, unless it is abundantly clear that, when it was made, the defendant fully appreciated the possibility of its subsequent use in evidence The jury must always remain impartial and keep an open mind until the conclusion of the case. When the evidence has been concluded, the jury will be directed on the matters which they have to take into consideration, before they arrive at their decision. The punishment which follows the verdict is a matter for the judge. The jury, however, have the right to make a recommendation to mercy if they so desire.
ASSISTANT
| English | Persian | |---------|---------| | Previous Conviction of the Accused | سابقه قبلی محکومیت متهم | | Another rule of evidence, particularly applicable to criminal cases, does not allow anything to be said during the course of the trial as to any previous conviction recorded against the defendant, or to suggest he is of bad character, unless he himself has put his character in issue by giving evidence of good character or has attacked the character of a witness for the prosecution. | قانون دیگری در مورد شواهد، که به طور خاص برای پروندههای جنایی قابل استفاده است، اجازه نمیدهد که هر چیزی طی روند محاکمه در مورد سابقه قبلی ثبت شده علیه متهم یا پیشنهاد در مورد شخصیت بد او گفته شود، مگر اینکه خود او با ارائه دلیلی از شخصیت خوب یا حمله به شخصیت شاهد ادعای مدعیالعموم، شخصیت خود را مطرح کرده باشد. | | This rule is imposed to protect a defendant of bad character from the prejudice of a jury learning of a previous conviction. | این قانون برای محافظت از متهم با شخصیت بد در برابر تعصب هیئتمنصفه در یادگیری از یک سابقه قبلی وضع شده است. | | If such evidence were allowed it would tend to relieve the prosecution of its duty to prove the guilt of the defendant in respect of the specific charge for which he is on trial. | اگر چنین شواهدی مجاز باشد، ممکن است تکلیف ادعای مدعیالعموم را برای اثبات گناه متهم در مورد اتهام خاصی که وی در حال محاکمه برای آن است، کاهش دهد. | | For the same reason, the failure of the defendant to give evidence in his own defence should not be regarded as an indication that he is guilty. | به همین دلیل، عدم ارائه شهادت از سوی متهم به عنوان دفاع از خود نباید به عنوان نشانهای از گناه او تلقی شود. | | Prosecution may not normally refer to any statement by the defendant confessing his guilt, unless it is abundantly clear that, when it was made, the defendant fully appreciated the possibility of its subsequent use in evidence. | معمولاً مدعیالعموم نمیتواند به هر بیانیهای از سوی متهم که گناه خود را اقرار میکند، ارجاع دهد، مگر اینکه کاملاً واضح باشد که، زمانی که این اقرار انجام شد، متهم به احتمال استفاده بعدی آن در شواهد کاملاً واقف بوده است. | | The jury must always remain impartial and keep an open mind until the conclusion of the case. | هیئتمنصفه همیشه باید بیطرف باقی بماند و تا پایان پرونده ذهن باز داشته باشد. | | When the evidence has been concluded, the jury will be directed on the matters which they have to take into consideration, before they arrive at their decision. | زمانی که شواهد به اتمام رسید، هیئتمنصفه راهنمایی میشوند در مورد مسائلی که باید قبل از رسیدن به تصمیم خود در نظر بگیرند. | | The punishment which follows the verdict is a matter for the judge. | مجازاتی که به دنبال حکم میآید، مربوط به قاضی است. | | The jury, however, have the right to make a recommendation to mercy if they so desire. | با این حال، هیئتمنصفه حق دارند در صورت تمایل، توصیه به رأفت ارائه دهند. |