Respan Dataset Explorer

아래 영어를 한글로 번역해주세요.

The editor could not be opened due to an unexpected error: Could not initialize webview: Error: Could not register service worker: InvalidStateError: Failed to register a ServiceWorker: The document is in an invalid state..}

에디터를 열 수 없었습니다. 예상치 못한 오류로 인해: 웹뷰를 초기화할 수 없습니다: 오류: 서비스 워커를 등록할 수 없습니다: InvalidStateError: 서비스워커를 등록하는 데 실패했습니다: 문서가 유효하지 않은 상태입니다.

Скажи кратко Эпоха возрождения, что возрождается

Эпоха Возрождения — это период культурного «перерождения» в Европе, примерно с XIV по XVII век, когда происходит возвращение к античному наследию Греции и Рима. Возрождается интерес к искусству, науке, литературе и философии античности, что ведет к значительным изменениям в обществе, культуре и мышлении, ставя человека и разум в центр внимания.

1. Прочитайте приведенные ниже размышления менеджера о предстоящем дне и план дня, который он составил.
Ну и день сегодня предстоит! Сейчас только девять часов утра, а дел навалилось столько, что, кажется, времени катастрофически не хватит.
Звонил рассерженный клиент: не получил заказ в срок. Надо бы ему перезвонить, выяснить все вопросы, успокоить. Материалы к выставке нужно готовить: открытие через две недели, а ни слайдов, ни текста для рекламных буклетов еще нет. Да и насчет полиграфии пора бы озадачиться, позвонить и заказать изготовление материалов – календарики всякие, листовки, буклеты, сувениры, плакаты, а то, как всегда, в последний момент спохватимся, и опять – голый стенд и две жалкие листовки. Позор!
На 13.00 назначены переговоры с поставщиком – это дело святое, надо ехать самому. Интересно только, на чем? Машину из сервиса так и не нашел времени забрать, а надо бы. На метро? Или такси заказать? Ничего себе – так у нас же еще презентация сегодня! Ну конечно, начало в 18.00, а команда ни сном, ни духом. Срочно надо всех собирать на инструктаж. Хорошо бы еще текст статьи в «Экономический вестник» отредактировать, а то уже месяц валяется где-то в столе. Кстати, о столе, не мешало бы разобраться в этом хаосе, а то вечно полчаса копаешься, пока нужный документ найдешь. А так хотелось сегодня в спортзал сходить, размяться! Ну, это вряд ли. Если еще учесть накопившийся объем не внесенной в базу данных информации по клиентам… А ведь это потенциальная прибыль фирмы.
Ну вот, позвонила секретарь – через полчаса совещание у шефа, присутствие обязательно. Надо успеть хотя бы набросок плана дня сделать, а то опять половина задач из головы вылетит. Итак, что там у нас самое главное на сегодня?
2. Проанализируйте размышления и составленный план. Отметьте ошибки, которые были допущены. 

1. Время менеджера частично сосредоточено на проблемах и панике из-за недостатка времени, вместо того чтобы спокойно рассмотреть все задачи и составить приоритеты.
2. Менеджер не планирует с учетом возможности делегирования задач коллегам, что позволило бы более эффективно использовать время.
3. Задачи в плане не имеют четких сроков исполнения, что может привести к процрастинации и упущению сроков.
4. Некоторые задачи (например, разборка стола) не являются срочными и важными для достижения бизнес-целей, что отвлекает от более важных дел.
5. Менеджер не уделяет внимание своему здоровью и планам на спортзал, что может негативно отразиться на его производительности в долгосрочной перспективе.
6. В плане нет конкретных шагов по решению каждой задачи, что может привести к потере времени на поиски решения и эффективного выполнения задач.
7. Необходимо выделить время на приоритетные задачи и оставить время на случайные непредвиденные события, чтобы управлять ими более эффективно.

Traduit en anglais "Dans cette nature paisible, son attirail (féminin) fait trop de bruit. Je vais être clair, cher Oleg, j’apprécie moyennement ce genre de chose. Pourtant, j’aime l’art du nu en photographie. Ici je trouve cela vulgaire. As-tu un message à me faire passer ? "

In this peaceful nature, her outfit (feminine) makes too much noise. I will be clear, dear Oleg, I do not really appreciate this kind of thing. However, I do like nude art in photography. Here I find it vulgar. Do you have a message for me?

traduit en anglais "As-tu un message à me faire passer ? Si oui, lequel ?"

Do you have a message for me? If yes, what is it?

Is deep learning a algorithm?

Deep learning is not a single algorithm, but rather a subset of machine learning that is based on a set of algorithms that model high-level abstractions in data by using multiple processing layers with complex structures or otherwise composed of multiple non-linear transformations. These models are known as neural networks, and deep learning entails using neural networks with many layers, hence the term "deep."

Deep learning techniques involve various algorithms and methodologies designed to teach computers to learn and make decisions like humans do, progressing from basic concepts to more complex ones. This approach is widely used in areas such as image and speech recognition, natural language processing, and autonomous vehicles among others.

In summary, deep learning is an approach or a method in the broader field of machine learning that utilizes a class of algorithms structured in layers to create an "artificial neural network" that can learn and make intelligent decisions on its own.

write 1000 words to introduce traditional rule based ai.

Traditional rule-based AI, often referred to as symbolic AI, represents one of the foundational approaches in the field of artificial intelligence that thrived from the 1950s to the late 1980s. Unlike the data-driven nature of modern AI which relies on learning patterns from vast datasets, traditional rule-based AI focuses on the application of pre-defined, human-crafted rules to make decisions and inferences. This essay introduces the concept of traditional rule-based AI, traces its historical development, outlines its core principles and applications, and discusses its strengths and limitations.

### Historical Context and Evolution

The inception of rule-based AI traces back to the early days of artificial intelligence research, a period characterized by optimism and the quest to replicate human intelligence. Pioneers like John McCarthy and Marvin Minsky were instrumental in laying down the foundational ideas of AI, including the emphasis on using logical rules to mimic human reasoning. The era witnessed the development of programming languages such as LISP, which became synonymous with AI development due to its suitability for handling symbolic computation.

During this period, AI research was dominated by the belief that intelligence could be emulated by breaking down thought processes into smaller, logical units - rules that a machine could execute. This approach led to the creation of expert systems, which are essentially sophisticated rule-based systems that leverage domain-specific knowledge to make decisions.

### Principles of Rule-Based AI

At the heart of rule-based AI is a straightforward yet powerful concept: intelligence can be achieved by meticulously following a set of rules. These rules, often expressed as “if-then” statements, enable the system to perform tasks by logically processing inputs and making deductions or inferences based on its rule set. A typical rule-based system comprises a knowledge base, which stores facts and the rule set, and an inference engine, which applies the rules to the known facts to deduce new information or make decisions.

Rule-based AI systems are deterministic. Given a particular set of inputs and rules, they will always produce the same output, ensuring predictability and transparency in decision-making processes.

### Applications

Despite the advent of more sophisticated AI techniques, rule-based AI systems continue to hold value in specific applications where the decision-making process must be interpretable and based on clear, logical rules. One classic example is in the realm of medical diagnosis expert systems, such as MYCIN, developed in the 1970s, which helped identify bacteria causing severe infections and recommend antibiotics.

In the financial sector, rule-based AI systems are utilized for compliance monitoring, where they check transactions against a set of regulatory and company policy rules to flag potential issues. Similarly, in customer service, rule-based chatbots can handle standard inquiries by following a predetermined script, allowing for efficient and consistent responses.

### Strengths and Limitations

The strength of rule-based AI lies in its simplicity and explicability. Systems built on this paradigm are transparent in their operations, making them particularly useful in domains where understanding the decision-making process is crucial, such as in healthcare and legal advice. The determinism of rule-based systems ensures reliability and consistency in their conclusions.

However, the limitations of rule-based AI are substantial. The approach is labor-intensive, requiring significant effort to capture domain knowledge and formulate it into actionable rules. It struggles with handling the complexity and variability of real-world scenarios that do not fit neatly into predefined rules. Moreover, rule-based systems are not inherently capable of learning or adapting to new information that was not considered during their design, marking a stark contrast to the capabilities of modern machine learning-based AI systems.

### Conclusion

Traditional rule-based AI represents a critical chapter in the development of artificial intelligence. While it has been superseded in many areas by more adaptive and sophisticated technologies, the principles of rule-based AI continue to influence the field. Its emphasis on transparency, determinism, and the logical structuring of knowledge lays a foundational understanding that serves as a foil to the black-box nature of many contemporary AI models. As the AI community strives towards creating more interpretable and explainable AI systems, revisiting the insights and methodologies of traditional rule-based AI might provide valuable perspectives. Thus, despite its limitations, rule-based AI continues to be an important area of study and application in the broader AI ecosystem.

0:0:0.0 --> 0:0:3.220
Mah Jin-Khai
The call to make the OK.
0:0:3.750 --> 0:0:11.0
Mah Jin-Khai
Yeah, I the the main reason I said that this call right, just want to understand on the firearm compliance for zero.
0:0:11.10 --> 0:0:15.360
Mah Jin-Khai
I think from the flag you guys have mentioned that it's not.
0:0:15.370 --> 0:0:16.950
Mah Jin-Khai
It's not fair and compliance right now.
0:0:16.960 --> 0:0:18.40
Mah Jin-Khai
There's something in the room.
0:0:18.110 --> 0:0:25.980
Mah Jin-Khai
Just just curious when you're gonna be available because this this gonna highly impact our decision probably.
0:0:25.990 --> 0:0:26.860
Mah Jin-Khai
I'm not sure, Chris.
0:0:26.870 --> 0:0:29.860
Mah Jin-Khai
Will also be on that because especially the one way thing.
0:0:30.620 --> 0:0:33.270
Chris DiPierro
Well, yeah, so background, really.
0:0:33.280 --> 0:0:34.160
Chris DiPierro
There's 22.
0:0:34.340 --> 0:0:40.950
Chris DiPierro
Well, one product right now, that is FedRamp certified, they basically run two instances.
0:0:40.960 --> 0:0:44.690
Chris DiPierro
There's essentially the people who care about better app certification and the people who don't.
0:0:44.700 --> 0:0:48.280
Chris DiPierro
So they've got a US instance that up for that.
0:0:48.810 --> 0:1:11.460
Chris DiPierro
That product wasn't necessarily in our short term roadmap for integration with our common authentication for a variety of reasons, but uh, they are searching around for a assault because right now it's Support a little bit of federation, but mostly they have username and password users and now their those users are all asking for MFA, right?
0:1:11.950 --> 0:1:16.620
Chris DiPierro
So they kind of said, hey, we're doing our own kind of look around.
0:1:16.630 --> 0:1:18.20
Chris DiPierro
We we've seen it.
0:1:18.30 --> 0:1:20.160
Chris DiPierro
We've found this cognito thing that looks pretty good.
0:1:33.550 --> 0:1:33.760
Mah Jin-Khai
Umm.
0:1:20.170 --> 0:1:34.230
Chris DiPierro
We're gonna maybe go integrate with that and we kind of said well hang on and and one of the reasons they said that is because whether this is true or not, AWS is convinced them that they just FedRAMP compliant for that as the stand up a US instant to cognito and they're good to go.
0:1:34.750 --> 0:1:50.760
Chris DiPierro
Umm, we said, well, we don't really want you guys doing your own thing if we can avoid it, we'd rather you be part of the broader project and they kind of said, yeah, we've heard you been doing stuff with lots 0 so and so forth, but obviously the federal stuff comes comes up there.
0:1:50.810 --> 0:1:53.180
Chris DiPierro
So that that that's not Devonway that's a product called Huddle.
0:1:53.610 --> 0:2:1.290
Chris DiPierro
Umm, there's other product that that JK is talking about is absolutely unplanned for our broader integration.
0:2:1.300 --> 0:2:5.200
Chris DiPierro
That's Devonway they are not yet FedRamp certified.
0:2:5.470 --> 0:2:7.670
Chris DiPierro
They are in the process right?
0:2:7.680 --> 0:2:8.370
Chris DiPierro
Like I don't know.
0:2:8.420 --> 0:2:9.620
Chris DiPierro
I'm gonna.
0:2:9.630 --> 0:2:23.400
Chris DiPierro
I don't wanna come off as a FedRamp expert by any means, but they've done a lot of that kind of initial steps where you work with kind of a consultant to go through things and they are on their way with an initiative to get it done this year essentially.
0:2:25.150 --> 0:2:29.410
Chris DiPierro
And like I said, they're they're clearly within the scope of what we were looking to do.
0:2:30.160 --> 0:2:31.370
Chris DiPierro
They haven't raised any.
0:2:31.740 --> 0:2:47.130
Chris DiPierro
They don't know enough about what our initiative is going on here right now with you guys to really have an opinion, but obviously we need to be able to come to them with an answer when they ask the question of like how do we handle the the FedRAMP case.
0:2:47.200 --> 0:2:56.400
Chris DiPierro
Again, I would probably expect that we'll have more than one environment stood up, that one is already primarily US space, but not quite sure.
0:2:56.410 --> 0:3:9.680
Chris DiPierro
I'm convinced that this is gonna turn the entire city of the infrastructure right now into like a federal compliant infrastructure or whether they would spin off kind of a a second instance more or less a of that.
0:3:9.690 --> 0:3:13.780
Chris DiPierro
Not quite sure their plans there but but yeah, I just kind of want to know the story.
0:3:13.790 --> 0:3:15.480
Chris DiPierro
At least it sounds like, yeah.
0:3:15.520 --> 0:3:24.460
Chris DiPierro
Sorry I haven't been jumping on the slack thread I did except the invite, but then I just haven't really been having a browser window open to that.
0:3:25.50 --> 0:3:27.840
Chris DiPierro
So if you guys have already talked to some of this, apologies for that.
0:3:27.850 --> 0:3:33.810
Chris DiPierro
But just kind of curious what your kind of plans going going forward are.
0:3:33.930 --> 0:3:42.220
Chris DiPierro
I did look up, you know, Okta, Austero, FedRamp and it seems like you've got some guidance on on it out there.
0:3:42.230 --> 0:3:44.370
Chris DiPierro
But like I it seemed a little bit mixed.
0:3:44.380 --> 0:3:46.640
Chris DiPierro
So kind of just curious to hear your your take.
0:3:47.750 --> 0:3:48.220
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
Sure.
0:3:49.10 --> 0:3:49.380
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
Yeah.
0:3:49.390 --> 0:4:3.850
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
Thank you very much for for providing that context and we're in a bit of a similar situation at the moment in terms of our and a FedRamp road map.
0:4:4.0 --> 0:4:13.390
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
And we have a plans for the Auth0 platform to be uh FedRamp compliance.
0:4:14.140 --> 0:4:25.870
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
Our octo platform is already FedRAMP high compliant, which sometimes can cause some confusion, but the platform that we're evaluating now or zero at the moment isn't.
0:4:26.300 --> 0:4:26.530
Chris DiPierro
Umm.
0:4:26.340 --> 0:4:31.130
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
And do you know whether you would need to be fed or moderate or federate federal pie?
0:4:31.630 --> 0:4:33.240
Chris DiPierro
I'm I'm pretty sure it'd be moderate.
0:4:33.810 --> 0:4:34.70
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
OK.
0:4:33.430 --> 0:4:34.360
Chris DiPierro
Be honest with you.
0:4:34.370 --> 0:4:35.140
Chris DiPierro
I know, I know, I know.
0:4:35.150 --> 0:4:35.890
Chris DiPierro
Huddles moderate.
0:4:36.0 --> 0:4:41.460
Chris DiPierro
I'm not 100% sure I'm Devonway, but by hope would be that it would be in the moderate but but.
0:4:43.250 --> 0:4:44.780
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
OK, OK. Got it.
0:4:44.790 --> 0:4:45.520
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
That makes sense.
0:4:46.210 --> 0:4:59.210
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
And so the FedRamp moderate certification is has been budgeted for and is in the road map and they're expecting it to take.
0:5:5.560 --> 0:5:5.780
Chris DiPierro
Umm.
0:5:1.510 --> 0:5:8.430
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
Between 12 and 18 months, and that gives you probably an idea of where it is on the road map.
0:5:8.500 --> 0:5:10.550
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
So it's not a.
0:5:10.600 --> 0:5:15.300
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
It's definitely not a short term item that we expect to deliver within the next ones two quarters.
0:5:16.550 --> 0:5:28.440
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
And and there's a little bit of uncertainty obviously in, in, in terms of the exact delivery date because of the nature of the certification and the things that are involved.
0:5:30.220 --> 0:5:30.410
Chris DiPierro
Umm.
0:5:28.450 --> 0:5:44.680
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
Obviously, as you guys know, going through it yourselves and but I would probably estimate towards the end of this year beginning of next and assuming there weren't any delays to that, that's kind of what we're seeing at the moment.
0:5:46.490 --> 0:5:54.890
Chris DiPierro
Is it are are you is, are you sponsored or are you just kind of doing this on your own or is there an agency that's kind of working with you?
0:5:56.740 --> 0:5:57.770
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
Well, that's a great question.
0:5:57.780 --> 0:6:0.120
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
I don't know is the truth.
0:6:5.730 --> 0:6:5.910
Chris DiPierro
OK.
0:6:0.130 --> 0:6:8.80
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
I'd have to connect to have to find out who's who's working on it internally and try and connect with them to to get more details on that.
0:6:10.270 --> 0:6:10.950
Chris DiPierro
OK, that's fine.
0:6:19.830 --> 0:6:20.110
Chris DiPierro
Yeah.
0:6:31.410 --> 0:6:31.680
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
OK.
0:6:20.120 --> 0:6:31.870
Chris DiPierro
I mean, so well, OK, I guess help me understand one quick thing you said Octa is as as a platform it certified, but also there isn't.
0:6:31.880 --> 0:6:35.590
Chris DiPierro
I thought we kinda so octobot Auth0.
0:6:35.600 --> 0:6:40.480
Chris DiPierro
So explain to me a little bit more about the differences here that we're talking through.
0:6:39.830 --> 0:6:41.920
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
So sure.
0:6:41.970 --> 0:6:45.680
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
And so Octar has a cell architecture.
0:6:46.70 --> 0:6:48.900
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
So we have different types of cells.
0:6:55.520 --> 0:6:55.720
Chris DiPierro
Umm.
0:7:1.790 --> 0:7:2.30
Chris DiPierro
OK.
0:7:8.290 --> 0:7:8.500
Chris DiPierro
Umm.
0:6:49.650 --> 0:7:10.340
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
For example, we have US cells, EU cells, but we also have highly regulated cells and so we have the ability to deploy an Octa environment into an highly regulated cell and therefore the back end of October would be FedRamp compliant as long as it's deployed into that cell with the Auth0 architecture.
0:7:14.380 --> 0:7:14.620
Chris DiPierro
Umm.
0:7:10.470 --> 0:7:21.70
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
We have the ability to deploy tenants in different regions, but we don't have the same cell kind of separation on that on that platform at the moment.
0:7:21.430 --> 0:7:21.690
Chris DiPierro
OK.
0:7:21.80 --> 0:7:45.910
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
So I I don't have the details of exactly how they will be looking to achieve at the specific at whether whether it will be a a similar type of setup, but I know that in the past and Auth0 has got add-ons for things like HIPAA, PCI DSS and and things like that.
0:7:52.540 --> 0:7:52.800
Chris DiPierro
Umm.
0:7:46.520 --> 0:7:54.70
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
And so I'd imagine that bedroom compliance will be a similar kind of add on and as long as you're Auth0.
0:7:54.80 --> 0:7:58.560
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
Tenant is deployed into the right environment, then it would be considered FedRamp compliant.
0:7:59.750 --> 0:7:59.960
Chris DiPierro
Umm.
0:8:1.760 --> 0:8:2.70
Chris DiPierro
OK.
0:8:1.450 --> 0:8:31.570
Mah Jin-Khai
Let's say let's say, let's say, assuming that you guys, uh, achieving the Fed Rams in 12 months time or something like that, do we do we need to change our integration codes or you gonna be like it's just a matter of like Auth0 redeploy the things really that's that's wanted to understand the maintenance work because we might we might already start some work right now and I don't want the dev team to make huge changes there that's curious like how will be the impact on the development.
0:8:33.990 --> 0:8:37.260
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
I I don't know is is is the answer.
0:8:37.270 --> 0:8:45.260
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
I'm sorry about that, but I think because we don't have details at the moment around is actually how that's gonna be achieved and.
0:8:48.710 --> 0:8:48.950
Chris DiPierro
OK.
0:8:48.320 --> 0:8:54.470
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
I don't know whether you would need to migrate into a different environment, for example, or whether you would be able to.
0:8:54.540 --> 0:8:55.910
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
I'd imagine there would.
0:8:55.960 --> 0:9:0.340
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
Your tenant would need to be in a particular environment and so if you're deployed into.
0:9:19.410 --> 0:9:19.630
Chris DiPierro
Umm.
0:9:2.650 --> 0:9:32.60
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
Standard public cloud that wouldn't be Feb Fedramp compliant environment if if I take octar as the example if someone was deployed into a standard USL and they needed to be fed ramp compliant we would need to migrate their option environment into the correct cell and I I can I can be pretty confident that the same thing will need to happen on the Auth0 side if the if you if you're a start off now and then the FedRamp compliance would need to come in later.
0:9:34.550 --> 0:9:34.750
Chris DiPierro
OK.
0:9:38.590 --> 0:9:39.120
Jenny (Okta)
It's it's.
0:9:39.130 --> 0:9:47.180
Jenny (Okta)
It's worth Matt explaining maybe if if it help how complicated if, if at all that would be if and when we got to that site and maybe you don't know the answer to that.
0:9:47.190 --> 0:9:48.310
Jenny (Okta)
But just in case we do.
0:9:51.500 --> 0:10:0.490
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
And yeah, it will depend on a couple of things, but we have got a tools that make that migration as seamless as possible.
0:10:0.540 --> 0:10:5.100
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
Like there are two things that really make that migration very easy.
0:10:5.110 --> 0:10:9.500
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
If if it would be required and the first is the migration of the users.
0:10:13.390 --> 0:10:13.610
Chris DiPierro
Umm.
0:10:9.610 --> 0:10:19.610
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
So as you guys know, we have an automatic migration capability for getting users over to cognito with no user impact and the same approach can be used for migrating between two or zero tenants.
0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:21.160
Chris DiPierro
OK.
0:10:21.140 --> 0:10:32.450
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
The second is you are able to export all of the Auth0 config and using our developer tools like the Auth0.
0:10:41.790 --> 0:10:41.950
Chris DiPierro
Yeah.
0:10:32.460 --> 0:10:43.970
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
CLI, so you would be able to import that config straight into a new tenant and and you'd have effectively a A duplicated setup so the the migration should be pretty straightforward.
0:10:44.970 --> 0:10:45.320
Chris DiPierro
Yeah.
0:10:53.60 --> 0:10:53.290
Mah Jin-Khai
Umm.
0:11:4.160 --> 0:11:4.420
Mah Jin-Khai
Uh.
0:10:45.330 --> 0:11:7.210
Chris DiPierro
So I mean, I think you know at the end of the day the messaging JK is look, look, it's on all serious red map, we're talking you guys said end of the year, but let's be realistic, looks like Q 12025 that probably not a problem for Devonway just to be straightforward JK because First off they get through there all their own stuff.
0:11:10.890 --> 0:11:11.290
Mah Jin-Khai
Ohh.
0:11:7.220 --> 0:11:12.530
Chris DiPierro
And then secondly, we said we're not really integrating them into like the end of the year anyway.
0:11:12.870 --> 0:11:18.510
Chris DiPierro
So even if our message is OK, you're integrated in and now the FedRamp stuff is a little bit behind that.
0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:30.800
Chris DiPierro
I don't think that's really a problem, so I think this is more of a huddle issue than it is Devonway issue in the granting with things and mainly because if we don't have a solve for them, they're going to find their own solve.
0:11:31.560 --> 0:11:31.750
Mah Jin-Khai
Umm.
0:11:30.990 --> 0:11:38.390
Chris DiPierro
Hey so so I this probably becomes a situation where we gotta talk with them a little bit.
0:11:39.250 --> 0:11:40.280
Chris DiPierro
Yeah, deeper.
0:11:40.350 --> 0:11:48.620
Chris DiPierro
I don't know exactly in their world if they could wait that long or not for their FedRAMP customers, right?
0:11:48.630 --> 0:11:58.300
Chris DiPierro
Cause again remember they got split between two different instances and I don't know what the like customer base percentage is, but my guess is more on the non FedRamp side than on the Fedramp side.
0:11:58.310 --> 0:12:10.450
Chris DiPierro
So like if the answer to them is we can solve your your problem on the non Federated side this year and it's all your FedRAMP problem early next year that might be sufficient.
0:12:10.460 --> 0:12:14.40
Chris DiPierro
But I don't know that's the thing that we have to have a conversation with them about.
0:12:14.40 --> 0:12:15.310
Mah Jin-Khai
I yeah.
0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:17.750
Mah Jin-Khai
I think majority of the customer is on the USB.
0:12:18.790 --> 0:12:20.480
Chris DiPierro
Are there and?
0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:28.490
Mah Jin-Khai
They say the the message that I got is like, yeah, the message that I got is like, if they, if you, if you wanted to interview with huddle right, the our services must be fine and combined that's the problem.
0:12:28.580 --> 0:12:28.800
Chris DiPierro
Umm.
0:12:28.900 --> 0:12:30.0
Mah Jin-Khai
But, but it's OK.
0:12:30.90 --> 0:12:32.250
Mah Jin-Khai
It's maybe you can deal with separately.
0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:38.90
Mah Jin-Khai
So for Devonway it looks like OK, I'm not sure how.
0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:39.640
Mah Jin-Khai
Yeah, I'm not sure how the customer.
0:12:39.910 --> 0:12:40.140
Mah Jin-Khai
Yeah.
0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:40.840
Chris DiPierro
Probably we, we we should still set expectations anyway but but yeah.
0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:43.90
Mah Jin-Khai
Uh, OK.
0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:46.60
Mah Jin-Khai
So is there, is there anyway?
0:12:46.70 --> 0:12:47.300
Mah Jin-Khai
Sorry, stupid question.
0:12:47.310 --> 0:12:50.540
Mah Jin-Khai
Is there a way you can speed this stuff or limit like make sure.
0:12:50.610 --> 0:12:51.380
Mah Jin-Khai
Yeah.
0:12:51.490 --> 0:12:52.720
Mah Jin-Khai
So it's it's the same question.
0:12:52.510 --> 0:12:53.610
Chris DiPierro
Can can we put up?
0:12:52.730 --> 0:12:54.320
Mah Jin-Khai
My boss I was born ask.
0:12:53.770 --> 0:12:56.720
Chris DiPierro
Can we put a + a + 1 vote on the roadmap?
0:12:57.190 --> 0:12:57.350
Mah Jin-Khai
Yeah.
0:12:56.730 --> 0:12:58.440
Chris DiPierro
Basically, so I think what you're asking but.
0:12:57.390 --> 0:12:59.440
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
That, yeah, of course.
0:12:59.550 --> 0:13:0.240
Mah Jin-Khai
Yeah, yeah.
0:12:59.450 --> 0:13:1.140
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
Yeah, but that's exactly what I can do.
0:13:1.150 --> 0:13:8.200
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
So I can raise a UMA effectively like a product gap type thing against the opportunity.
0:13:8.850 --> 0:13:8.990
Chris DiPierro
Yeah.
0:13:8.210 --> 0:13:16.560
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
So all of those flow up to the product team and they get a consolidated view so they can see which customers, how many customers are asking for things.
0:13:17.50 --> 0:13:17.260
Chris DiPierro
Umm.
0:13:21.90 --> 0:13:21.250
Chris DiPierro
Yeah.
0:13:33.190 --> 0:13:33.350
Chris DiPierro
Yep.
0:13:37.150 --> 0:13:37.420
Chris DiPierro
Yeah.
0:13:16.890 --> 0:13:37.460
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
And this particular requirement is a little bit different though to others in the sense of because it's like a a certification process that we need to go through and it's probably gonna be a bit harder for our product team to kind of like prioritize it in the same way they would a new feature, but and I'll raise it anyway, cause there's no harm in me doing that.
0:13:37.470 --> 0:13:37.920
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
So of course.
0:13:37.430 --> 0:13:40.460
Chris DiPierro
At the end of the day, it's it's, it's not just a product feature that you drop in.
0:13:40.470 --> 0:13:43.560
Chris DiPierro
There's gonna be external dependencies that they're that they're kind of stuck on.
0:13:43.570 --> 0:13:46.120
Chris DiPierro
So, umm yeah. OK.
0:13:49.610 --> 0:13:49.790
Jenny (Okta)
OK.
0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:52.520
Mah Jin-Khai
OK, I think we are.
0:13:52.700 --> 0:13:53.690
Mah Jin-Khai
We are all good.
0:13:54.350 --> 0:13:54.530
Chris DiPierro
Yeah.
0:13:53.700 --> 0:13:57.130
Mah Jin-Khai
So yeah, anything ending us.
0:13:56.950 --> 0:13:57.350
Chris DiPierro
If there.
0:13:59.970 --> 0:14:8.540
Chris DiPierro
Is there like an I sorry, I again, I don't know what you guys already shared on Slack, but is there any sort of official write up on this that I can share with any of our product teams?
0:14:8.550 --> 0:14:10.810
Chris DiPierro
Like obviously we can share that we've had the conversations and so on.
0:14:10.850 --> 0:14:11.80
Mah Jin-Khai
Umm.
0:14:10.820 --> 0:14:11.980
Chris DiPierro
But, but is there any?
0:14:12.680 --> 0:14:27.510
Chris DiPierro
Just, you know, do publish a public road map or anything like that, that have this on it, you know, to inspire a little bit of confidence or on those products and stuff like that or do you or at least have a blurb on it like something like that that we can share?
0:14:29.690 --> 0:14:31.900
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
I'll try and find something external.
0:14:33.80 --> 0:14:33.210
Chris DiPierro
Sure.
0:14:37.930 --> 0:14:38.560
Chris DiPierro
Yeah, I got you.
0:14:31.970 --> 0:14:41.740
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
We we definitely have material at the moment, all this stuff I am seeing is internal only and but I'll try and find something that we can share.
0:14:41.750 --> 0:14:42.870
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
It certainly find something.
0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:43.700
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
I'll I'll share it with you.
0:14:44.890 --> 0:14:45.80
Chris DiPierro
OK.
0:14:56.220 --> 0:14:56.530
Mah Jin-Khai
Uh.
0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:56.730
Chris DiPierro
And then JK, you know, let's just find a time to talk to Majid and Tim potentially and see what we can, what we can work through say.
0:14:58.950 --> 0:14:59.320
Mah Jin-Khai
Who?
0:14:59.330 --> 0:14:59.750
Mah Jin-Khai
Uh, yeah.
0:14:58.650 --> 0:15:2.360
Jenny (Okta)
By the way, it's we we've spoken to Majid, we've spoken to Majid before.
0:15:2.370 --> 0:15:3.400
Jenny (Okta)
Actually funny.
0:15:3.220 --> 0:15:3.670
Mah Jin-Khai
Ah, OK.
0:15:2.940 --> 0:15:4.180
Chris DiPierro
Every I have you. Yeah.
0:15:5.600 --> 0:15:5.870
Chris DiPierro
Yes.
0:15:4.580 --> 0:15:6.580
Jenny (Okta)
Yeah, yeah, he he was in touch with us probably.
0:15:5.880 --> 0:15:8.130
Chris DiPierro
So how how those conversations gone?
0:15:8.140 --> 0:15:8.510
Chris DiPierro
Like what?
0:15:8.520 --> 0:15:8.770
Chris DiPierro
What?
0:15:8.780 --> 0:15:10.490
Chris DiPierro
What has been his take then?
0:15:12.250 --> 0:15:21.260
Jenny (Okta)
Yeah, I think we met out, Matt, probably can speak to it a little bit better, but from my perspective I what I recall was very it was around the same time Duraid started talking to.
0:15:22.530 --> 0:15:22.750
Chris DiPierro
OK.
0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:29.860
Chris DiPierro
Correct. Yeah.
0:15:21.270 --> 0:15:32.0
Jenny (Okta)
So we got, we started, Matt and I kind of we're working together and thinking seems to us that Duraid has kind of got a bigger project in mind and Majid's kind of concerned about his particular huddle use case.
0:15:32.70 --> 0:15:36.60
Jenny (Okta)
So we sort of figured at some point these paths would cross anyway.
0:15:36.310 --> 0:15:36.540
Chris DiPierro
Umm.
0:15:36.70 --> 0:15:37.760
Jenny (Okta)
So yeah, very mad.
0:15:38.150 --> 0:15:41.110
Jenny (Okta)
If you kind of have any recollection of.
0:15:40.540 --> 0:15:41.570
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
Yeah, same thing. Really.
0:15:41.580 --> 0:15:41.920
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
We have.
0:15:41.930 --> 0:15:50.890
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
We have like an initial conversation just to kind of like understand the requirements because we'd already spoken to Duraid before and then and we connected up with him.
0:15:51.350 --> 0:15:58.680
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
I think there was a understanding that there would be a sort of a consistent approach to identity applied across all of these applications anyway, so.
0:16:0.740 --> 0:16:15.970
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
Yeah, I haven't personally spoken again with Majid because we just we we carried on working with Gerade and Co on the assumption that huddle would be brought into Skype at some point or or would be kept out of Skype and for whatever reason.
0:16:22.40 --> 0:16:23.90
Chris DiPierro
Alright, bear enough.
0:16:23.220 --> 0:16:23.440
Mah Jin-Khai
OK.
0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:27.50
Jenny (Okta)
OK.
0:16:27.450 --> 0:16:28.60
Jenny (Okta)
Well, thanks guys.
0:16:28.70 --> 0:16:28.140
Jenny (Okta)
Yeah.
0:16:27.630 --> 0:16:28.510
Mah Jin-Khai
OK, I think yeah.
0:16:29.770 --> 0:16:30.100
Jenny (Okta)
Think.
0:16:30.110 --> 0:16:30.300
Jenny (Okta)
Yeah.
0:16:35.210 --> 0:16:35.400
Mah Jin-Khai
Umm.
0:16:42.510 --> 0:16:42.700
Chris DiPierro
Yep.
0:16:42.890 --> 0:16:43.860
Mah Jin-Khai
OK, no problem.
0:16:30.310 --> 0:16:44.360
Jenny (Okta)
Thanks for setting this up JK and I'm really glad that when you guys have questions like that, that, yeah, just reach out straight away, get some time in our diary and we're happy to sort of talk through it for the next thing that comes up too. OK?
0:16:44.620 --> 0:16:45.20
Jenny (Okta)
And just to.
0:16:44.850 --> 0:16:48.420
Mah Jin-Khai
I guess that, yeah, I guess that next week will be of hybrid holiday Ingale.
0:16:49.580 --> 0:16:49.870
Chris DiPierro
Area.
0:16:55.170 --> 0:16:56.530
Chris DiPierro
Right next week.
0:16:48.430 --> 0:16:57.210
Mah Jin-Khai
I'm not sure if the team will set up something next week, but I I believe that PingPing gonna set up something for lower, no?
0:16:56.630 --> 0:16:58.480
Chris DiPierro
Next, next next week might be a bit of a punt.
0:16:58.490 --> 0:16:59.740
Chris DiPierro
You guys have a holiday?
0:16:59.750 --> 0:17:3.320
Chris DiPierro
I'm out the first three days Duraid out the whole week.
0:17:3.660 --> 0:17:3.820
Mah Jin-Khai
Yeah.
0:17:5.920 --> 0:17:6.60
Mah Jin-Khai
Yeah.
0:17:8.130 --> 0:17:8.350
Jenny (Okta)
OK.
0:17:11.670 --> 0:17:11.880
Mah Jin-Khai
Umm.
0:17:3.330 --> 0:17:14.580
Chris DiPierro
So like I I think I think probably reconnect the week after that, that noted Jenny, we have done some work on trying to figure out where we are on volume is so that that will continue.
0:17:14.590 --> 0:17:18.530
Chris DiPierro
But but we'll we'll get through that in the not too distant future here so.
0:17:19.100 --> 0:17:19.640
Jenny (Okta)
Great.
0:17:19.650 --> 0:17:19.970
Jenny (Okta)
Thank you.
0:17:19.980 --> 0:17:23.930
Jenny (Okta)
And I and on that note too, Chris, I was actually I mentioned it in the email that I sent yesterday.
0:17:23.230 --> 0:17:26.190
Chris DiPierro
Yeah, I saw in the email that you you're gonna send some guidance that.
0:17:26.60 --> 0:17:26.600
Jenny (Okta)
Yeah.
0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:27.50
Jenny (Okta)
What?
0:17:27.60 --> 0:17:29.330
Jenny (Okta)
What I've I've been doing the same thing on my side to just get it.
0:17:33.430 --> 0:17:33.600
Chris DiPierro
Sure.
0:17:37.100 --> 0:17:37.260
Chris DiPierro
Yeah.
0:17:29.340 --> 0:17:44.590
Jenny (Okta)
I keep saying to you that we reward up front commitment and all that, but I thought, you know, I keep saying I better actually just find out exactly what that means so that I can share that with you in case that makes your life easier and impacts the plans that you're making on your side and the questions you're asking on your side.
0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:48.810
Jenny (Okta)
So I've made some really good progress on that and I'm hoping to get something in your inbox.
0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:49.720
Jenny (Okta)
Did you?
0:17:49.730 --> 0:17:50.510
Jenny (Okta)
Are you are you?
0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:51.720
Jenny (Okta)
Are you in next week, Chris?
0:17:52.570 --> 0:17:53.50
Chris DiPierro
Uh.
0:17:53.90 --> 0:17:54.40
Chris DiPierro
Not till Thursday.
0:17:55.580 --> 0:17:55.890
Jenny (Okta)
Right.
0:17:54.50 --> 0:17:56.690
Chris DiPierro
I'll be out Monday through Wednesday, but back Thursday.
0:18:2.270 --> 0:18:2.390
Chris DiPierro
Yeah.
0:18:5.420 --> 0:18:5.630
Chris DiPierro
OK.
0:17:55.940 --> 0:18:5.670
Jenny (Okta)
OK, I was hoping to get something in your inbox early next week, so maybe you won't see it until later in the week, but but anyway, I'll send it to you and and JK and Duraid as well.
0:18:6.220 --> 0:18:7.810
Jenny (Okta)
I'm so yeah.
0:18:7.820 --> 0:18:8.540
Jenny (Okta)
Keep an eye out for that.
0:18:15.850 --> 0:18:16.530
Chris DiPierro
Right, that's fine.
0:18:9.70 --> 0:18:16.880
Jenny (Okta)
Uh, and we do just to just to let you know to PingPing did put some time in for next Tuesday at Tuesday at 10:00 AM UK time.
0:18:17.590 --> 0:18:18.110
Jenny (Okta)
Umm.
0:18:17.910 --> 0:18:18.470
Mah Jin-Khai
Ohh OK.
0:18:18.170 --> 0:18:26.720
Jenny (Okta)
So we'll kind of we'll plan to jump on the if, if if you're on holiday, if folks aren't, don't show up to the call, I guess then we'll know that.
0:18:26.250 --> 0:18:26.990
Chris DiPierro
Yeah, that that's fine.
0:18:27.740 --> 0:18:28.420
Jenny (Okta)
Yeah, OK.
0:18:27.890 --> 0:18:28.620
Mah Jin-Khai
Yeah, I think I.
0:18:28.630 --> 0:18:30.340
Mah Jin-Khai
Yeah, I think should be OK can just go ahead.
0:18:30.350 --> 0:18:35.650
Mah Jin-Khai
I I think they will be off only stuff on Wednesday so I I let them to do deal with it.
0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:38.800
Chris DiPierro
OK.
0:18:38.100 --> 0:18:39.970
Mah Jin-Khai
OK, we're good.
0:18:37.410 --> 0:18:40.380
Jenny (Okta)
OK, nice one.
0:18:40.180 --> 0:18:40.540
Mah Jin-Khai
Thank you.
0:18:40.540 --> 0:18:41.40
Jenny (Okta)
Thanks guys.
0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:42.10
Mah Jin-Khai
OK, bye.
0:18:41.830 --> 0:18:42.620
Chris DiPierro
Yep, thanks.
0:18:42.630 --> 0:18:43.200
Chris DiPierro
Good talk to you.
0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:43.480
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
OK.
0:18:43.380 --> 0:18:44.10
Jenny (Okta)
Interesting.
0:18:43.490 --> 0:18:44.50
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
Thanks guys.
0:18:44.60 --> 0:18:44.530
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
Bye bye.
0:18:44.590 --> 0:18:44.840
Matt (Okta) (Guest)
You too.
0:18:43.210 --> 0:18:44.870
Chris DiPierro
Have a good weekend, right?
0:18:44.970 --> 0:18:46.10
Jenny (Okta)
There's about 5.


summarize all the points in the meeting as captured by the above transcript.

In the meeting, the following key points were discussed:

1. **FedRAMP Compliance Concerns**: Mah Jin-Khai initiated the meeting to understand FedRAMP compliance for their firearm application, indicating a critical impact on their decision-making. Chris DiPierro clarified the distinction between their product currently FedRAMP certified and others that are not, emphasizing the need for a U.S. instance for compliance.

2. **Integration with Auth0 and Octa**: Chris DiPierro explained that while one of their products is FedRAMP certified, it wasn't initially on their short-term integration roadmap. The team is looking into solutions for integrating multi-factor authentication (MFA) and other features, acknowledging a product called Huddle needing FedRAMP compliance.

3. **FedRAMP Certification Timeline**: Matt from Okta provided insights into the timeline for achieving FedRAMP compliance for the Auth0 platform, specifying a 12 to 18-month timeframe. He distinguished between the Okta and Auth0 platforms in terms of their current FedRAMP compliance status.

4. **Concerns about Migration and Integration Work**: There was a discussion on whether future integration or migration efforts would be needed once FedRAMP compliance is achieved and how it might affect ongoing development work.

5. **Clarification on Okta’s Architecture**: Matt further detailed Okta’s cellular architecture, explaining the difference between U.S. cells, EU cells, and highly regulated cells. He outlined how Auth0 would need to be deployed in the right environment to achieve FedRAMP compliance.

6. **Project Prioritization and Roadmap Influence**: Mah Jin-Khai inquired about the possibility of expediting the FedRAMP certification process. Matt agreed to raise a product gap against the opportunity, although he noted the unique challenges due to the nature of certification processes.

7. **Meeting with Product Teams**: Chris DiPierro talked about the necessity of discussing these matters with their product teams, especially Huddle, to understand their capacity to wait for FedRAMP compliance solutions.

8. **Future Meetings and Communication**: Towards the end, discussion touched on scheduling future meetings to follow up on these topics, despite upcoming holidays affecting availability. Jenny from Okta mentioned she would work on getting more precise information about how up-front commitment could relate to discounts or benefits for their plan on achieving FedRAMP compliance.

The meeting concluded with an agreement to share further information via email and to continue the conversation, especially regarding how specific timelines and processes for achieving FedRAMP compliance can align with the company’s product integration and certification needs.

list down all the points in the meeting as captured by the above transcript, instead of summarizing.

Based on the transcript, here are the detailed points discussed in the meeting:

1. **Purpose of the Call**: Mah Jin-Khai initiated the call to understand the firearm application's compliance with FedRAMP.

2. **FedRAMP Certification Status**: The team discussed the current FedRAMP certification status of their products, specifically mentioning one product being FedRAMP certified and how it affects their roadmap for integration.

3. **Integration with Common Authentication**: Discussion on integrating with their common authentication system and the challenges it presents, particularly in relation to FedRAMP compliance.

4. **Need for MFA and Federation Support**: Chris DiPierro mentioned a product needing support for multi-factor authentication (MFA) and federation due to user demand.

5. **AWS and FedRAMP Compliance for Cognito**: Discussed AWS convincing them that standing up a US instance of Cognito would be FedRAMP compliant.

6. **Concerns about Doing Their Own Integration**: The team expressed a desire to keep product integration within the broader project instead of products solving their compliance issues independently.

7. **Product Called Huddle and Its FedRAMP Needs**: Mentioned a product called Huddle that needs to be FedRAMP compliant but isn't part of the immediate integration plans.

8. **Devonway's Planned Integration and FedRAMP Certification**: Discussion around Devonway, another product that's unplanned for broader integration but is in the process of FedRAMP certification.

9. **Differences between Okta and Auth0's FedRAMP Compliance**: Clarity was provided on Auth0’s current lack of FedRAMP compliance versus Okta's compliance, despite Okta's acquisition of Auth0.

10. **Timeframe for FedRAMP Compliance on Auth0 Platform**: Matt (Okta) mentioned a 12 to 18-month timeframe for Auth0 to achieve FedRAMP compliance.

11. **Impact of Compliance on Development Work**: Concerns were raised about how achieving FedRAMP compliance could affect the development work and whether changes or migrations would be necessary.

12. **Migration and Deployment Process**: Detailed discussion on the process of migrating to a FedRAMP-compliant environment, including user migration and configuration export/import.

13. **Possibility of Expediting FedRAMP Compliance**: Inquiry into whether it’s possible to expedite the FedRAMP compliance process and how to put a "vote" on prioritizing it on the roadmap.

14. **Future Communication and Follow-Ups**: Plans to continue dialogue, especially with product teams like Huddle, to understand their specific needs and timelines with respect to FedRAMP compliance.

15. **Holiday Schedules Affecting Meetings**: Mention of upcoming holidays potentially affecting the schedule for future meetings and the need to coordinate accordingly.

16. **Background Discussions with Other Stakeholders**: Mention of having had conversations with other stakeholders about identity approaches for individual applications and aligning them within a broader strategy.

The meeting was largely centered on discussing FedRAMP compliance and its impact on product development, timelines for achieving compliance, and the implications for different product integrations within the company’s portfolio.

Can u pls list down all the points in the meeting as captured by the above transcript in more detail.

Certainly! Here are the detailed points from the meeting transcript:

1. **Initiation of Discussion on Firearm Compliance**: 
   - Mah Jin-Khai expresses the purpose of the call is to understand the firearm application's compliance with FedRAMP.

2. **Clarification on FedRAMP Compliance Status**:
   - It's highlighted that one of their products is FedRAMP certified, which divides their user base between those who need FedRAMP certification and those who don't.

3. **Integration Concerns Regarding FedRAMP**:
   - They have a product not immediately on the roadmap for integration due to various reasons, including FedRAMP compliance issues. It supports federation to some degree but lacks MFA for its users.

4. **Exploration of AWS Cognito for Compliance**:
   - There's an exploration of using AWS Cognito as it's perceived to meet FedRAMP compliance by setting up a U.S. instance.

5. **Intent to Keep Integration Within the Project**:
   - The team prefers to find a solution within the broader project rather than allowing products to independently seek compliance solutions.

6. **Specific Mention of Product ‘Huddle’ and Its Compliance Needs**:
   - Huddle, a product mentioned, is needed to be FedRAMP compliant. It's indicated that it's a separate concern from another product, Devonway, which is also in the discussion for compliance.

7. **Devonway’s Integration and Certification Journey**:
   - Devonway's broader integration and its ongoing efforts to achieve FedRAMP certification are discussed. The product is within the scope of what they're looking to do.

8. **FedRAMP Compliance Timeline for Auth0**:
   - Matt from Okta outlines a 12-18 month timeframe for reaching FedRAMP compliance for the Auth0 platform, contrasting it with Okta's current compliance status.

9. **Development Impact from Compliance Efforts**:
   - Concerns are raised about how subsequent compliance efforts might necessitate changes or migrations impacting the development work.

10. **Detailed Discussion on Migration and Deployment Processes**:
    - The process of migrating to a FedRAMP-compliant environment is discussed, including exporting and importing configurations and the seamless migration of users.

11. **Inquiry on Expedited Compliance Process**:
    - The possibility of expediting the FedRAMP compliance process and prioritizing it on the roadmap is questioned.

12. **Future Strategic Discussions**:
    - There are plans to continue discussions, particularly with Huddle’s product team, to align on compliance timelines and strategies.

13. **Consideration of Holidays in Planning Meetings**:
    - Upcoming holidays are mentioned as affecting the scheduling of future meetings, with some team members being out of the office.

14. **Previous Engagements with Stakeholders**:
    - Jenny from Okta recalls past conversations with Majid, indicating ongoing discussions about identity strategies across applications.

15. **Request for External Documentation**:
    - Chris requests official documentation or a public roadmap concerning FedRAMP compliance that can be shared with product teams to instill confidence.

These detailed points capture the core discussions in the meeting, focusing on navigating FedRAMP compliance across different products, exploring integration strategies, and outlining timelines and processes for achieving compliance.