Respan Dataset Explorer

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 3 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 3 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073665.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_91->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 1999-09-20->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029073665.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_91->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 1999-09-20->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073665.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_91->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 1999-09-20->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>

</output>
    accession number: GCA_029073665.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_91->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 1999-09-20->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A
<output/>

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 3 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 3 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073685.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_94->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2000-10-04->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029073685.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_94->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2000-10-04->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073685.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_94->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2000-10-04->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>

    </output>
        accession number: GCA_029073685.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_94->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2000-10-04->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A
    <output/>

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 3 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 3 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073695.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_90->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 1999-08-26 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029073695.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_90->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 1999-08-26->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073695.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_90->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 1999-08-26->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>

</output>
accession number: GCA_029073695.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_90->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 1999-08-26 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A
<output/>

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 3 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 3 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073715.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_92->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2000-02-03 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 39->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029073715.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_92->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2000-02-03->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 39->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073715.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_92->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2000-02-03->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 39->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>

```
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073715.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_92->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2000-02-03 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 39->serotype: N/A
<output/>
```

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 3 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 3 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073745.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_89->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 1999-07-06 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 4->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029073745.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_89->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 1999-07-06->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 4->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073745.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_89->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 1999-07-06->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: MLST:4->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>

    </output>
        accession number: GCA_029073745.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_89->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 1999-07-06 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 4->serotype: N/A
    <output/>

Assistant: 
User: [Give me only the actual fundamental news. Please provide it concisely in list format for an English learner. I prefer exact dates of future events instead of "soon" or "upcoming." If there is any big news worth mentioning, tell me. Finally, tell me what $BAT means. Do not tell me about price technical analysis.]
3h: gm $BAT Brigade https://t.co/RLIjs7nuaz
5h: @Batearn Have any clue why these $BAT were burned?
2h: @Smokeyjoethepi1 @trycarbonio I will buy more $csix now, I love the project, their growing ecosystem, super important token burn, they have a strong community and important partnerships. This deserves to hit $5 in a bull market! What crypto project is your competitor? $Bat ?
16h: Fernando Tatis Jr. sent a ball to the moon!. . His bat followed shortly after 🚀 #NLDS https://t.co/7fYkBmpHEe
3h: GM $BAT. @bat_guilhermee has finished the 100 $BAT Landscapes!! See the full collection below
3h: FS1 is the industry leader in graphics telling you when Shohei Ohtani bats again https://t.co/uazXcNHN6X
2h: 🤣🤣 Show us your #BraveBeasts!. Here's a thread with the best submissions thus far! . 👇👇. Share yours in the thread! 🐱🐶🦆
16h: If Tatis was hitting 1.000 with a single in every at bat this playoffs, he’d be doing worse than he is right now https://t.co/2LMckTK6uf
3h: @CHBStaple @Batearn @Hassan_Abedi @brave The ads displayed by Brave are not set by default, it's a feature you'd have to opt in. The Brave ads are privacy-focused, as they don't collect any of your data. Not only that, but like @Batearn mentioned, you're rewarded $BAT by viewing them
1h: Now live at BaT Auctions: 1996 Honda Z50J Monkey Gold Limited Edition. https://t.co/cO0C3Cu2zC https://t.co/XfkIUPfJ6P
10h: National Guard Air Crews Evacuate Civilians from Bat Cave, North Carolina. . #BatCaveNC #NationalGuard #Evacuation #DisasterResponse #StormImpact #EmergencyEvacuation #HurricaneHelene #BreakingNews #NorthCarolina #HeleneRecovery https://t.co/1wAHyCxONN
1d: https://t.co/HRb9hS7ZVi
50m: I have this irrational fear that Matthew Boyd is going to inexplicably shut the Tigers’ offense down today
5h: Now live at BaT Auctions: 1964 Land Rover 109 Series IIA. https://t.co/YR5t1iPYuv https://t.co/TNIS1eqDfP
3h: I've finished the $BAT Landscape collections!. Full 100 below! https://t.co/SS7uG296mg
4h: Now live at BaT Auctions: 351-Powered 1965 Ford F-250. https://t.co/0hCV734sxC https://t.co/Tu1cuCPPIb
5h: Fans may have been exposed to a bat at a Salt Shed concert, the health department says. https://t.co/y9SrPaDbh4 https://t.co/XiQjlrJsxP
34m: Seeing the flood from Victors perspective really makes you feel how evil Riddler really was, all these lives taken in an instant and he’s happy about it… https://t.co/UvtrZ3v1JQ
Assistant:

**Fundamental News:**

1. **Hurricane Helene Impact**: National Guard Air Crews are evacuating civilians from Bat Cave, North Carolina, due to Hurricane Helene. (10 hours ago)
2. **Health Advisory**: Fans may have been exposed to a bat at a Salt Shed concert, according to the health department. (5 hours ago)

**Big News Mention**: There is significant attention on Hurricane Helene and the response efforts in North Carolina.

**Explanation of $BAT**:
- $BAT refers to the Basic Attention Token, a cryptocurrency used within the Brave browser. Users can earn $BAT by viewing privacy-focused ads on the browser.

Please let me know if you need further clarification on any point!

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 3 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 3 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073785.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_86->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 1998-12-22->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 90->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029073785.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_86->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 1998-12-22->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 90->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073785.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_86->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 1998-12-22->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 90->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>

</output>
accession number: GCA_029073785.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_86->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 1998-12-22->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 90->serotype: N/A
<output/>

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 3 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 3 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073805.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_85->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 1998-12-03 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 5->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029073805.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_85->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 1998-12-03->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 5->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073805.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_85->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 1998-12-03->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 5->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>

</output>
accession number: GCA_029073805.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_85->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 1998-12-03 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 5->serotype: N/A
<output/>

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 3 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 3 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073815.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_87->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 1999-02-18 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 75->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029073815.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_87->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 1999-02-18->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 75->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073815.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_87->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 1999-02-18->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 75->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>

</output>
accession number: GCA_029073815.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_87->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 1999-02-18 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 75->serotype: N/A
<output/>

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 3 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 3 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073845.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_84->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: N/A->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 5->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029073845.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_84->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: Not Applicable->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 5->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073845.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_84->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: N/A->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 5->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>

</output>
accession number: GCA_029073845.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_84->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: N/A->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 5->serotype: N/A
<output/>