Respan Dataset Explorer

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 3 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 3 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073475.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_104->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 1990-10-05 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: MLST:94->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029073475.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_104->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 1990-10-05->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 94->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073475.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_104->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 1990-10-05->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 94->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>

</output>
accession number: GCA_029073475.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_104->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 1990-10-05 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 94->serotype: N/A
<output/>

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 3 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 3 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073505.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_100->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2005-11-03 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 85->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029073505.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_100->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2005-11-03->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 85->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073505.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_100->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2005-11-03->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: MLST:85->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>

```
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073505.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_100->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2005-11-03 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 85->serotype: N/A
<output/>
```

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 3 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 3 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073525.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_101->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2006-05-09->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 99->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029073525.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_101->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2006-05-09->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 99->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073525.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_101->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2006-05-09->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 99->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>

</output>
accession number: GCA_029073525.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_101->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2006-05-09->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 99->serotype: N/A
<output/>

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 3 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 3 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073545.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_98->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2002-07-16 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 104->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029073545.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_98->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2002-07-16->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 104->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073545.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_98->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2002-07-16->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 104->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>

```
</output>
accession number: GCA_029073545.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_98->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2002-07-16 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 104->serotype: N/A
<output/>
```

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 3 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 3 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073565.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_99->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2002-08-27->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 99->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029073565.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_99->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2002-08-27->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 99->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073565.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_99->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2002-08-27->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 99->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>

</output>
accession number: GCA_029073565.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_99->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2002-08-27->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 99->serotype: N/A
<output/>

Act as my personal styling advisor. I need to style some things for the outfit. I have: a blue oversized checkered shirt, beige banana jeans, black bomber jacket.

Absolutely, I'd be happy to help you style an outfit with the items you have:

- **Blue oversized checkered shirt**
- **Beige banana jeans**
- **Black bomber jacket**

**Here's how you can put together a cohesive and stylish look:**

---

### **1. Base Outfit**

- **Top:** Start with your **blue oversized checkered shirt**. Since it's oversized, you have a couple of options:
  - **Tucked In Front (French Tuck):** Tuck in just the front part of the shirt into your jeans. This creates a casual yet put-together look and helps define your waist.
  - **Layered Look:** Wear a basic **white or black fitted t-shirt** underneath and leave the checkered shirt unbuttoned for a relaxed layered style.

- **Bottoms:** Pair the shirt with your **beige banana jeans**. The relaxed fit of banana jeans complements the oversized shirt, creating a comfortable and trendy silhouette.

### **2. Outer Layer**

- **Black Bomber Jacket:** Add your **black bomber jacket** over the shirt. The bomber jacket's structure will contrast nicely with the oversized shirt and add some shape to your outfit.
  - If the weather is mild, drape the jacket over your shoulders for a chic touch.

### **3. Footwear**

- **Casual Options:**
  - **White Sneakers:** Classic white sneakers will keep the look casual and fresh.
  - **Ankle Boots:** Black or beige ankle boots can dress up the outfit slightly while tying in the colors.

- **Elevated Options:**
  - **Loafers or Oxfords:** For a more polished appearance, consider black or brown leather loafers.

### **4. Accessories**

- **Belt:** A **black leather belt** can help tie in the black bomber jacket and add definition at the waist if you choose to tuck in the shirt.
- **Jewelry:**
  - **Minimalist Necklace:** A simple silver or gold chain can add a subtle touch of elegance.
  - **Wristwatch:** A classic watch can enhance the outfit's sophistication.
- **Bag:**
  - **Crossbody Bag or Backpack:** A black or brown leather bag can be both practical and stylish.
- **Headwear:**
  - **Beanie or Cap:** Depending on the weather, a black or neutral-colored beanie can add a cozy element.
- **Sunglasses:**
  - **Wayfarer or Aviator Styles:** These can add a cool edge to your outfit, especially on sunny days.

### **5. Styling Tips**

- **Color Coordination:** The blue of the shirt and beige of the jeans are complementary; adding black elements through the jacket and accessories will ground the outfit.
- **Proportions:** Since both the shirt and jeans are on the looser side, the bomber jacket adds structure. Consider rolling up the sleeves of the shirt or jacket to show a bit of skin and prevent the outfit from overwhelming your frame.
- **Layering:** If layering with a t-shirt, keep it in a solid, neutral color to avoid clashing with the checkered pattern.
- **Textures:** Mixing different textures (cotton shirt, denim jeans, and potentially leather accessories) adds visual interest.

### **6. Final Look**

By combining these elements, you'll achieve a stylish, cohesive outfit that's perfect for casual outings, coffee dates, or urban adventures. The mix of relaxed and structured pieces creates balance, while the accessories and footwear allow you to tailor the look to your personal style.

---

**Feel free to adjust any of these suggestions to better suit your preferences or the occasion. If you have any specific items or styles in mind, let me know, and I can provide more tailored advice. Enjoy your stylish ensemble!**

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 3 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 3 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073585.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_97->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2001-09-03 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029073585.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_97->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2001-09-03->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073585.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_97->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2001-09-03->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: MLST:76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>

```
</output>
    accession number: GCA_029073585.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_97->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2001-09-03 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A
<output/>
```

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 3 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 3 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073595.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_96->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2001-01-22->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029073595.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_96->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2001-01-22->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073595.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_96->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2001-01-22->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>

</output>
accession number: GCA_029073595.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_96->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2001-01-22->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A
<output/>

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 3 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 3 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073625.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_95->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2000-10-04 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 74->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029073625.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_95->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2000-10-04->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 74->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073625.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_95->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2000-10-04->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 74->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>

</output>
    accession number: GCA_029073625.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_95->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2000-10-04 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 74->serotype: N/A
<output/>

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 3 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 3 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073645.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_93->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2000-08-09->geographic information of islateion: New South Wales, Australia->host name: vaccine->mlst type: 5->serotype: N/A->vaccine: yes
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029073645.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_93->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2000-08-09->geographic information of islateion: Not Applicable->host name: pig->mlst type: 5->serotype: N/A->vaccine: yes


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029073645.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_93->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2000-08-09->geographic information of islateion: Not Applicable->host name: vaccine->mlst type: MLST:5->serotype: N/A->vaccine: yes
<output/>

metadata is inconsist->accession number: GCA_029073645.1

Inconsistency found in the host name:
- Source 0: vaccine
- Source 1: pig
- Source 2: vaccine