Respan Dataset Explorer

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 4 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 4 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072485.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_157->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-09-12 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072485.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_157->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-09-12->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072485.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_157->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-09-12->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 3:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072485.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_157->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-09-12->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no

</output>
accession number: GCA_029072485.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_157->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-09-12 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A
<output/>

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 4 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 4 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072505.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_156->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-09-12->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072505.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_156->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-09-12->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072505.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_156->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-09-12->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 3:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072505.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_156->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-09-12->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no

</output>
accession number: GCA_029072505.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_156->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-09-12->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A
<output/>

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 4 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 4 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072525.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_154->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-09-12->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072525.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_154->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-09-12->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072525.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_154->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-09-12->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: MLST:76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 3:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072525.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_154->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-09-12->geographic information of isolation: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no

</output>
    accession number: GCA_029072525.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_154->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-09-12->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A
<output/>

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 4 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 4 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072545.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_150->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-01 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072545.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_150->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-01->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072545.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_150->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-01->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 3:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072545.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_150->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-01->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no

</output>
    accession number: GCA_029072545.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_150->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-01 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A
<output/>

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 4 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 4 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072555.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_153->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-09-12->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072555.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_153->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-09-12->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072555.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_153->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-09-12->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: MLST:76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 3:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072555.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_153->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-09-12->geographic information of isolation: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no

```
</output>
    accession number: GCA_029072555.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_153->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-09-12->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A
<output/>
```

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 4 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 4 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072565.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_152->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-01->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 74->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072565.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_152->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-01->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 74->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072565.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_152->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-01->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 74->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 3:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072565.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_152->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-01->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 74->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no

</output>
accession number: GCA_029072565.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_152->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-01->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 74->serotype: N/A
<output/>

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 4 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 4 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072605.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_149->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-01 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 90->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072605.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_149->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-01->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 90->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072605.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_149->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-01->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 90->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 3:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072605.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_149->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-01->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 90->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no

</output>
    accession number: GCA_029072605.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_149->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-01 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 90->serotype: N/A
<output/>

Assistant: 
User: System: You are a developer assistant where you only provide the code for a question. No explanation required. Write a simple json sample.
    Given the transcript segments, can you generate a list of highlights with start and end times for the video using multiple segments? Please meet the following constraints:

    - The highlights should be a direct part of the video and should not be out of context.
    - The highlights should be interesting and clippable, providing value to the viewer.
    - The highlights should be 20 to 60 seconds MAXIMUM.
    - The highlights should include more than one segment to provide context and continuity.
    - The highlights should not cut off in the middle of a sentence or idea.
    - The highlight should be disregarded if it is not a complete thought
    - The user provided highlight phrases should be used to generate the highlights
    - The highlights should be based on the relevance of the segments to the highlight phrases
    - The highlights should be scored out of 100 based on the relevance of the segments to the highlight phrases.
    - The score should be greater than 80

    Respond with the following JSON schema with valid JSON syntax for highlights:

    {'$defs': {'Highlight': {'properties': {'title': {'description': 'Title of the Video highlight', 'title': 'Title', 'type': 'string'}, 'start_time': {'description': 'Start time of the video highlight', 'title': 'Start Time', 'type': 'number'}, 'end_time': {'description': 'End time of the video highlight', 'title': 'End Time', 'type': 'number'}, 'score': {'description': 'Score of the video highlight', 'title': 'Score', 'type': 'number'}}, 'required': ['title', 'start_time', 'end_time', 'score'], 'title': 'Highlight', 'type': 'object'}}, 'properties': {'chapters': {'description': 'List of Highlights', 'items': {'$ref': '#/$defs/Highlight'}, 'title': 'Chapters', 'type': 'array'}}, 'required': ['chapters'], 'title': 'HighlightSchema', 'type': 'object'}

    Each highlight should have the following fields:
    - title: title of the highlight
    - start_time: start time of the highlight as a float in seconds
    - end_time: end time of the highlight as a float in seconds
    - score: score of the highlight as a float out of 100
    
User: Key Phrases: Funny or Interesting

[2.26 - 6.66]:  It's weekend ducting with Colin Jost at Michael Chey. [14.54 - 16.06]:  Thank you very much. [16.32 - 17.12]:  Good evening, everyone. [17.28 - 18.88]:  We're welcome to weekend ducting. I'm Michael Chey. [19.02 - 19.90]:  I'm Colin Jost. [22.66 - 26.90]:  Well, guys, the election is exactly 30 days away. [26.90 - 32.40]:  Just think, in only 30 days, this whole nightmare will be nowhere close to over. [33.80 - 38.80]:  Earlier tonight, Donald Trump held a rally at the site of his first assassination attempt, [39.06 - 43.94]:  which I have to admit is very brave of him, though it was interesting that right before Trump spoke, [44.32 - 47.80]:  he sent JD Vance out in a long red tie in a blonde wig. [51.44 - 59.50]:  Elon Musk, seen here trying to jump to Mars, joined Trump on stage at the rally tonight, [59.50 - 64.92]:  which may be the last time Trump and Musk will be together until they co-host our Christmas show. [68.64 - 73.82]:  It was reported that last month, the U.S. added 245,000 new jobs. [73.82 - 76.50]:  Unfortunately, they were all Diddy accuser. [79.58 - 84.72]:  It was announced that Sean P. Diddy combs his sex-trafficking case has been assigned to a new judge, [85.06 - 87.08]:  one that Diddy hopes is cool with rapes. [91.64 - 92.82]:  I'd do it for that guy. [93.40 - 99.64]:  It was reported that Diddy once invited Prince Harry and Prince William to one of his parties, [99.64 - 100.86]:  but they did not go. [100.86 - 105.72]:  Although before Diddy could even finish writing the invite, Prince Andrew was there. [109.36 - 111.42]:  Yesterday, the devil went down to Georgia. [111.72 - 112.10]:  No, I'm kidding. [112.90 - 117.76]:  Donald Trump traveled to Georgia to survey the damage from Hurricane Helene, [117.90 - 120.80]:  which is bold because nothing scares Trump more than high winds. [124.12 - 128.88]:  Vice President Kamala Harris traveled to North Carolina to survey damage from the hurricane, [128.88 - 133.44]:  which is the second time this year she swooped in after a huge disaster. [140.20 - 145.82]:  New court filings in Donald Trump's election interference case revealed that on January 6, [146.22 - 149.90]:  Trump was scrolling through Twitter during the attack on the Capitol, [150.26 - 154.26]:  which is just so infuriating to those of us who were there fighting for him. [158.38 - 163.74]:  It was reported that Donald Trump has refused to release his medical records,
Assistant:
Assistant:

```json
{
  "chapters": [
    {
      "title": "Election Countdown and Trump's Rally",
      "start_time": 22.66,
      "end_time": 47.80,
      "score": 85.0
    },
    {
      "title": "Elon Musk Joins Rally and Employment Report",
      "start_time": 51.44,
      "end_time": 76.50,
      "score": 90.0
    },
    {
      "title": "Diddy, the Royals, and Trump's Georgia Visit",
      "start_time": 79.58,
      "end_time": 120.80,
      "score": 88.0
    },
    {
      "title": "Kamala Harris Hurricane Visit & Trump Tweets",
      "start_time": 124.12,
      "end_time": 154.26,
      "score": 92.0
    }
  ]
}
```

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 4 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 4 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072615.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_151->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-01 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072615.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_151->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-01->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072615.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_151->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-01->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 3:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072615.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_151->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-01->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no

</output>
    accession number: GCA_029072615.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_151->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-01 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A
<output/>

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 4 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 4 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072645.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_146->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-01 format->geographic information of isolation: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 75->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072645.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_146->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-01->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 75->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072645.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_146->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-01->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 75->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 3:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072645.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_146->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-01->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 75->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no

</output>
accession number: GCA_029072645.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_146->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-01 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 75->serotype: N/A
<output/>