Respan Dataset Explorer

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 4 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 4 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072025.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_178->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-08-11 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 90->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072025.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_178->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-08-11->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 90->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072025.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_178->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-08-11->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 90->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 3:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072025.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_178->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-08-11->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 90->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no

</output>
    accession number: GCA_029072025.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_178->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-08-11->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 90->serotype: N/A
<output/>

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 4 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 4 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072035.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_176->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-01->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 80->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072035.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_176->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-01->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 80->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072035.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_176->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-01->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 80->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 3:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072035.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_176->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-01->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 80->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no

</output>
    accession number: GCA_029072035.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_176->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-01->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 80->serotype: N/A
<output/>

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 4 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 4 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072045.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_177->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-08-11 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 90->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072045.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_177->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-08-11->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 90->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072045.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_177->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-08-11->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: MLST:90->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 3:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072045.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_177->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-08-11->geographic information of isolation: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 90->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no

</output>
    accession number: GCA_029072045.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_177->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-08-11 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 90->serotype: N/A
<output/>

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 4 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 4 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072085.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_175->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-03 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072085.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_175->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-03->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072085.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_175->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-03->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: MLST:76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 3:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072085.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_175->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-03->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no

</output>
accession number: GCA_029072085.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_175->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-03 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 76->serotype: N/A
<output/>

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 4 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 4 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072095.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_179->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-08-11 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 90->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072095.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_179->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-08-11->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 90->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072095.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_179->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-08-11->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 90->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 3:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072095.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_179->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-08-11->geographic information of isolation: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 90->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no

</output>
    accession number: GCA_029072095.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_179->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-08-11 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 90->serotype: N/A
<output/>

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 4 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 4 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072125.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_172->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-08-16 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 93->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072125.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_172->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-08-16->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 93->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072125.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_172->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-08-16->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 93->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 3:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072125.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_172->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-08-16->geographic information of isolation: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 93->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no

</output>
accession number: GCA_029072125.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_172->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-08-16 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 93->serotype: N/A
<output/>

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 4 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 4 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072135.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_174->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-08-16->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 99->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072135.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_174->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-08-16->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 99->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072135.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_174->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-08-16->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: MLST:99->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 3:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072135.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_174->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-08-16->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 99->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no

</output>
accession number: GCA_029072135.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_174->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-08-16->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 99->serotype: N/A
<output/>

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 4 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 4 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072145.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_170->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-08-16 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 93->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072145.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_170->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-08-16->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 93->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072145.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_170->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-08-16->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: MLST:93->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 3:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072145.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_170->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-08-16->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 93->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no

</output>
    accession number: GCA_029072145.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_170->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-08-16 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 93->serotype: N/A
<output/>

Assistant: 
User: [Give me only the actual fundamental news. Please provide it concisely in list format for an English learner. I prefer exact dates of future events instead of "soon" or "upcoming." If there is any big news worth mentioning, tell me. Finally, tell me what $USDC means. Do not tell me about price technical analysis.]
16m: 🎯 The @Avax BOOST rewards has officially launched on @_WOOFi! Over the next 12 thrilling weeks. . 🏦 3 #Avalanche vaults benefit from BOOST: $AVAX, $BTC.b, and $USDC. 💰 1000 of $sAVAX incentives. . 💫 Join this exciting opportunity to maximize your rewards! . . 🔽VISIT https://t.co/GKVtbY0Ybp
7h: I'm excited to share the project I completed this past weekend for the ZK Compression hackathon: . . Compress USDC in a Blink! 👀.  . Now, you can seamlessly compress, decompress, and send your compressed USDC directly on your timeline via @solana Actions and Blinks. https://t.co/rMSLULduel
19h: @dxrnelljcl Found it. $USDC . . MAX RETARDED COMMUNITY . . AfTQvbB8LxH475euZnZQYaaB91dfLFXVt2TqAMsapump https://t.co/IPIxAvStEu
21h: judging from the TG interactions it might be $usdc lmao https://t.co/uSvXWQiKmA
10h: Survived the night 👀. . Nobody ever got hurt holding $USDC ... yet
25m: 📣 #NAVX este acum disponibil pe #BybitLaunchpool și #BybitSpot împreună cu @navi_protocol!. . Deținători de SUI, este momentul vostru. Pune la Stake $SUI, $NAVX sau $USDC pentru șansa de a câștiga din fondul de premii de 2.5M NAVX!. . 🌐 Află mai multe: https://t.co/VRMKGorKV3. 💫 https://t.co/PXdvjBSU0u
24m: 🚨 🚨 🚨  56,114,033 #USDC (56,130,867 USD) transferred from Coinbase Institutional to unknown wallet. . https://t.co/JnqtTgFZFt
17h: $USDC full ported...Thanks for entry this will run to millions. :) https://t.co/oXXwa7PNTV
21h: $USDC is the future of finance . . 🦄🍩🐱
6h: [BYBIT] #Bybit Launchpool Introduces $SUI as First Native Token Pool, Replaces $USDT Pool with $USDC Pool
2h: 'The New Era of #EOS Network' Galxe campaign is less than 10 days away from ending and over 1000 contestants have already joined.. . A reminder of the key details:. 🗓️ Duration: 24/09/2024 - 16/10/2024. 🏆 Prizes: $200 $USDC (10 Winners). . Complete tasks, earn entries, and get your https://t.co/szD4l1ObUi
12h: 🔥 🔥 🔥  50,000,000 #USDC (50,027,500 USD) burned at USDC Treasury. . https://t.co/Oncswuyb4d
12h: GM Guardians. $USDC DIP. i knew it..... Cant sleep in peace 😂. . See ya at 1M https://t.co/Tc8cAfTnLQ
17h: $USDC this is going so much highooor. https://t.co/yOdt3WMACZ
1h: Finally a positive update for the @tangibleDAO / USDR situation. . The team shipped and started redeeming .9 USDC per USDR . . They have ~$2.5M liquidated for redemption, $750k distributed, and with 17M USDR deposited the task is 5% complete. . Some takes:. . - If only 17/40M of the usdr https://t.co/rpID753xxv
2h: The proposal to add $USDC to Aave's @LidoFinance instance has been executed.. . You can now borrow USDC using $wstETH as collateral (or go leveraged long on wstETH against USDC) using @Aave and DeFi Saver.. . 👉https://t.co/J9M2f2oUuf https://t.co/9ZioK39dDs
4d: You can earn +50% APR on your stables by 10x leveraging sUSDe with USDC/USDT on @0xfluid with this week's sUSDe APR being 10.6%.. . That's pure stable coin APR. No points, no locked tokens 🤯🌊. . Also, no risk of liquidation due to market price as we use contract based pricing. https://t.co/Me9Tt9ghwe
6h: @thisisdjen I’m out of $zazu and into $usdc . . Solana needs a good stable coin. . . AfTQvbB8LxH475euZnZQYaaB91dfLFXVt2TqAMsapump https://t.co/xnu8JqQsPK
9h: @rektsatoshisol can't be more bullish than that <3 $USDC
Assistant:

- Avax BOOST rewards have launched on WOOFi, offering incentives for $AVAX, $BTC.b, and $USDC across three Avalanche vaults.
- A project for the ZK Compression hackathon allows users to compress, decompress, and send $USDC on Solana.
- Bybit Launchpool has introduced $NAVX, available for staking alongside $SUI and $USDC.
- 56,114,033 $USDC (equivalent to $56,130,867) was transferred from Coinbase Institutional to an unknown wallet.
- 50,000,000 $USDC was burned at the USDC Treasury.
- Bybit replaced its $USDT pool with $USDC.
- TangibleDAO/USDR update: Redemption underway with $.9 USDC per USDR.
- Proposal executed to add $USDC to Aave's LidoFinance, allowing borrowing with $wstETH as collateral.
- Upcoming 'New Era of EOS Network' campaign ends 16/10/2024, offering $200 in $USDC for 10 winners.

**$USDC**: USD Coin (USDC) is a type of cryptocurrency known as a stablecoin, pegged 1:1 to the U.S. Dollar, used for easy, global digital currency transactions.

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 4 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 4 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist->accesssion number" followed by explain why and which part is inconsist. PS:
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. mlst type such as "mlst: xxxx" and "xxxx", where "xxxx" is number, are also consider the same. also, "mlst" may mispell as "mlsty", you need correct it before comparing
    e. Ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072155.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_173->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-08-16->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 93->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072155.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_173->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-08-16->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 93->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no


source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_029072155.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_173->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-08-16->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 93->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no
<output/>
source 3:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029072155.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_173->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-08-16->geographic information of isolation: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 93->serotype: N/A->vaccine: no

</output>
    accession number: GCA_029072155.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_173->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-08-16->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 93->serotype: N/A
<output/>