Respan Dataset Explorer

翻译：同样老师您可以看完他，然后告诉我您对他的一个看法。


经治疗未达指南推荐水平且与醛固酮存在根本联系的高血压代表着一项重大未满足医疗需求，该需求影响大量患者，他们需要更加有效且有针对性的治疗。（PPT有）对，我觉得这个陈述还比较客观。

Similarly, teacher, you can finish watching it and then tell me your opinion on it.

Hypertension that has not been brought to the recommended levels by treatment and that has a fundamental connection with aldosterone represents a significant unmet medical need, affecting a large number of patients who require more effective and targeted therapy. (This is on the PPT) Yes, I think this statement is relatively objective.

翻译：；老师您为什么觉得他比较客观？
说话人2 42:55
因为醛固酮这个问题在顽固性高血压里面，不达标的病人和就有密切相关。
所以说现在顽固性的高血压里面，三种药加上以后，实在不行就加醛固酮抑制剂，现在我们大家公认的就有这一条。一定要把醛固酮抑制剂用上，对吧？

Teacher, why do you think it is relatively objective?

Speaker 2 42:55
Because the issue with aldosterone is closely related to patients with resistant hypertension who fail to meet the standard. So, in the case of stubborn hypertension, after the addition of three types of medications, if that's still not effective, then an aldosterone inhibitor is added. This approach is now widely recognized by all of us. We must make use of aldosterone inhibitors, right?

翻译：用药后效果不理想

The effect of the medication is not satisfactory.

翻译：我刚跟你讲了，有时候一用上以后血压反而达标了，这就是说明醛固酮的异常，在这里面高血压里面，存在着严重的相关性，而这一项治疗在临床上仅仅是还没普及，所以说在以后的治疗方面是有很大的空间的。
说话人3 43:50
明白。
对于他这里所说，代表着一项重大的未满足医疗需求。对于他所说的需求，老师您认为他需要在这里展示一些什么样的数据或是证据才能代表这是一个很大的需求呢？
说话人2 44:08
所以这就需要做一些临床研究对吧？
现在这方面的研究结论应该出来了，所以说怎么是在临床上去推广普及。
现在就是这方面要有新的药品出来对吧？抑制醛固酮水平的药物，对吧？

As I just mentioned to you, sometimes after starting the treatment, the blood pressure actually reaches the target. This indicates that abnormalities in aldosterone are seriously correlated with hypertension. This treatment option is not yet widely adopted in clinical practice, suggesting there is substantial room for future therapeutic development.

Speaker 3 43:50
Understood. 

Regarding what has been stated here as representing a significant unmet medical need, what kind of data or evidence do you think needs to be presented here to show that this is indeed a significant demand?

Speaker 2 44:08
So, this would require conducting some clinical studies, right? 

The conclusions from such studies should now be available, so it's about how these are to be popularized and promoted in clinical practice. 

What's needed now are new drugs, right? Medications that inhibit aldosterone levels, correct?

冬瓜糖是什么

冬瓜糖，通常指的是冬瓜制作的一种甜味剂或糖果，其主要成分是糖和冬瓜。在中国和其他亚洲国家，冬瓜糖是一种传统的食品，常用于烹饪和制作甜点。冬瓜本身没有太多味道，但是通过糖渍和煮制过程，会变得非常甜，因此可以用来做为甜品的配料，或是直接作为小吃食用。

冬瓜糖的制作过程一般包括将冬瓜切片，然后用糖腌制，再通过加热煮制，最后晾干，使其变得甜而且质地适中。这种糖果保留了冬瓜的一些营养成分，如膳食纤维等，但要注意的是，由于加入了较多的糖分，摄入量不应过多。冬瓜糖可用于泡茶、制作糖水或作为糕点的材料。

有无语法错：What’s needed now is new drugs

No, there is no grammatical error in the sentence: "What’s needed now is new drugs." 

This sentence is correctly structured, with "What's needed now" acting as the subject and "is new drugs" as the predicate, stating the current necessity for new medications. It's clear, concise, and grammatically correct.

有无语法错：What’s needed now are new drugs,

Yes, the sentence "What’s needed now are new drugs," is also grammatically correct. In this case, the plural form "are" is used to match the plural noun "new drugs," which serves as the subject complement. This structure emphasizes that the current requirement or necessity is for multiple new medications. This sentence structure is appropriate for the context provided.

翻译：明白。然后他这里有一个说法，就是与醛固酮醇存在根本联系的高血压。老师，您觉得他这种用语用词您觉得有要修改的地方吗？
基本上通通顺我觉得
基本上还可以
了解。然后他其实在整个叙述的中间的部分，因为它是第三条嘛，中间部分。您觉得他能在这个位置去引出需要一个更加有效且更有针对性的治疗，您觉得在这里可以引出一项新的治疗吗？前面的信息足够铺垫吗？还是说需要更多的铺垫？您觉得在这里他们引出一个新的治疗，您觉得合适吗？还是说需要前面更加多的信息铺垫，老师您才会更认为应该在后面才能引出一项新的治疗。

Understood. And there's a phrase here about hypertension having a fundamental connection with aldosterone. Teacher, do you think there's any need to change the way this is worded?

It's fairly smooth, I think.
Overall, it's fine.

Understood. And actually, in the middle part of the narrative, since it is the third point, in the middle. Do you think it's appropriate to introduce the need for a more effective and targeted treatment at this point? Is the preceding information sufficient to lay the groundwork, or is more needed? Do you think it's appropriate here to introduce a new treatment? Or would you require more foundational information before you think a new treatment should be introduced later in the discourse?

翻译“这个话还可以说得过去。
说话人3 45:44
了解。
说话人2 45:45
因为需要大量的临床治疗的证据对吧？证据越多，越支持他们这种论据。

了解。对于他表达需求这方面的一个数据论据的话，老师您刚有提到需要一些全球大量的临床研究，您认为可能这个临床研究的一个数据或它应该是哪一方面的一个研究的数据，才能够证明他这方面的一个需求？”

"This part is passable.

Speaker 3 45:44
Understood.

Speaker 2 45:45
Because it requires a large amount of clinical treatment evidence, right? The more evidence there is, the more it supports their argument.

Understood. Regarding the data argument for expressing the demand, teacher, you just mentioned the need for a significant amount of global clinical research. What kind of data from these clinical studies do you think would be necessary to demonstrate this particular demand?"

有无语法错误：The more evidence there is, the more convincing the argument is.

No, there is no grammatical error in the sentence: "The more evidence there is, the more convincing the argument is."

This sentence uses a comparative structure correctly to express that an increase in evidence makes an argument more convincing. It's clear and grammatically correct.