Respan Dataset Explorer

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 4 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 4 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist" and explain why and which part is inconsist. PS: 
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. Also, ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
</output>
accession number: GCA_029102545.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_58->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: N/A->geographic information of islateion: N/A->host name: pig->mlst type: 73->serotype: N/A
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
{{{ Here_is_my_answer }}}

accession number: GCA_029102545.1->organism name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_58->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: N/A->geographic information of isolation: N/A->host name: pig->mlst: 73->serotype: N/A

{{{ I_finished_JB_147_xyz }}}
source 2:
------------------------------
<output/>
accession number: GCA_029102545.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_58->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: N/A->geographic information of islateion: NSW->host name: pig->mlst type: 73->serotype: N/A
<output/>
source 3:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029102545.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_58->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: N/A->geographic information of islation: N/A->host name: pig->mlst type: 73->serotype: N/A

metadata is inconsist. The inconsistency is in the "geographic information of isolation" field. Source 2 lists "NSW," while the other sources have "N/A."

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 4 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 4 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist" and explain why and which part is inconsist. PS: 
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. Also, ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
</output>
accession number: GCA_029102585.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_29->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2010-08-10->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 47->serotype: N/A
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
{{{ Here_is_my_answer }}}

accession number: GCA_029102585.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_29->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2010-08-10->geographic information of isolation: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 47->serotype: N/A

{{{ I_finished_JB_148_xyz }}}
source 2:
------------------------------
<output/>
accession number: GCA_029102585.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_29->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2010-08-10 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 47->serotype: N/A
<output/>
source 3:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029102585.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_29->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2010-08-10->geographic information of isolation: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 47->serotype: N/A

</output>
accession number: GCA_029102585.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_29->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2010-08-10->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 47->serotype: N/A
<output/>

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 4 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 4 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist" and explain why and which part is inconsist. PS: 
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. Also, ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
</output>
accession number: GCA_029102595.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_126->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-28->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: MLST:82->serotype: N/A
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
{{{ Here_is_my_answer }}}

accession number: GCA_029102595.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_126->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-28->geographic information of isolation: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 82->serotype: N/A

{{{ I_finished_JB_149_xyz }}}
source 2:
------------------------------
<output/>
accession number: GCA_029102595.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_126->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-28 format->geographic information of islateion: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 82->serotype: N/A
<output/>
source 3:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_029102595.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_126->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-28->geographic information of isolation: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 82->serotype: N/A

</output>
accession number: GCA_029102595.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: EMAI_126->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2017-11-28->geographic information of isolation: Australia->host name: pig->mlst type: 82->serotype: N/A
<output/>

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 4 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 4 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist" and explain why and which part is inconsist. PS: 
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. Also, ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
</output>
accession number: GCA_031215075.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: B18->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2018->geographic information of islateion: China: Hubei->host name: N/A->mlst type: N/A->serotype: N/A
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
{{{ Here_is_my_answer }}}

accession number: GCA_031215075.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: B18->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2018->geographic information of isolation: China: Hubei->host name: missing->mlst type: N/A->serotype: N/A

{{{ I_finished_JB_150_xyz }}}
source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_031215075.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: B18->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2018 format->geographic information of islateion: China: Hubei->host name: vaccine->mlst type: N/A->serotype: N/A
<output/>
source 3:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_031215075.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: B18->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2018-01-01->geographic information of isolation: China: Hubei->host name: missing->mlst type: N/A->serotype: N/A

metadata is inconsistent because the host name varies. It is "N/A" in source 0, "missing" in sources 1 and 3, and "vaccine" in source 2.

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 4 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 4 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist" and explain why and which part is inconsist. PS: 
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. Also, ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
</output>
accession number: GCA_033115815.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: SE-RD->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2012->geographic information of islateion: China: Hubei->host name: N/A->mlst type: N/A->serotype: N/A
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
{{{ Here_is_my_answer }}}

accession number: GCA_033115815.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: SE-RD->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2012->geographic information of isolation: China: Hubei->host name: missing->mlst type: N/A->serotype: N/A

{{{ I_finished_JB_151_xyz }}}
source 2:
------------------------------
<output/>
accession number: GCA_033115815.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: SE-RD->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2012 format->geographic information of islateion: China: Hubei->host name: vaccine->mlst type: N/A->serotype: N/A
<output/>
source 3:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_033115815.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: SE-RD->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2012-01-01->geographic information of isolation: China: Hubei->host name: missing->mlst type: N/A->serotype: N/A

metadata is inconsist

The inconsistency is in the "host name" field. The values are 'N/A', 'missing', and 'vaccine', which are not consistent.

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 4 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 4 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist" and explain why and which part is inconsist. PS: 
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. Also, ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
</output>
accession number: GCA_033115835.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: SE25->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2016->geographic information of islateion: China: Hunan->host name: N/A->mlst type: N/A->serotype: N/A
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
{{{ Here_is_my_answer }}}

accession number: GCA_033115835.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: SE25->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2016->geographic information of isolation: China: Hunan->host name: missing->mlst type: N/A->serotype: N/A

{{{ I_finished_JB_152_xyz }}}
source 2:
------------------------------
<output/>
accession number: GCA_033115835.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: SE25->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2016 format->geographic information of islateion: China: Hunan->host name: vaccine->mlst type: N/A->serotype: N/A
<output/>
source 3:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_033115835.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: SE25->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2016-01-01->geographic information of isolation: China: Hunan->host name: missing->mlst type: N/A->serotype: N/A

metadata is inconsist

The inconsistency lies in the "host name" field. Sources 0 and 2 list "N/A" and "vaccine" respectively, while sources 1 and 3 list "missing".

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 4 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 4 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist" and explain why and which part is inconsist. PS: 
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. Also, ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
</output>
accession number: GCA_033115845.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: B2->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2015->geographic information of islateion: China: Hubei->host name: N/A->mlst type: N/A->serotype: N/A
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
{{{ Here_is_my_answer }}}

accession number: GCA_033115845.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: B2->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2015->geographic information of isolation: China: Hubei->host name: missing->mlst type: N/A->serotype: N/A

{{{ I_finished_JB_153_xyz }}}
source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_033115845.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: B2->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2015 format->geographic information of islateion: China: Hubei->host name: N/A->mlst type: N/A->serotype: N/A
<output/>
source 3:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_033115845.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: B2->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2015-01-01->geographic information of isolation: China: Hubei->host name: missing->mlst type: N/A->serotype: N/A

metadata is inconsist because the "host name" field is inconsist. In source 0 and source 2, it is "N/A", while in source 1 and source 3, it is "missing".

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 4 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 4 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist" and explain why and which part is inconsist. PS: 
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. Also, ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
</output>
accession number: GCA_033115855.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: B52->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2018->geographic information of islateion: China:Hubei->host name: N/A->mlst type: N/A->serotype: N/A
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
{{{ Here_is_my_answer }}}

accession number: GCA_033115855.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: B52->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2018->geographic information of isolation: China: Hubei->host name: missing->mlst type: N/A->serotype: N/A

{{{ I_finished_JB_154_xyz }}}
source 2:
------------------------------
<output/>
accession number: GCA_033115855.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: B52->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2018 format->geographic information of islateion: China:Hubei->host name: vaccine->mlst type: N/A->serotype: N/A
<output/>
source 3:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_033115855.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: B52->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2018-01-01->geographic information of isolation: China:Hubei->host name: missing->mlst type: N/A->serotype: N/A

metadata is inconsistent

Explanation:
- The host name differs among the sources: 
  - Source 0 lists it as "N/A".
  - Source 1 lists it as "missing".
  - Source 2 lists it as "vaccine".
  - Source 3 lists it as "missing".

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 4 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 4 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist" and explain why and which part is inconsist. PS: 
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. Also, ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
</output>
accession number: GCA_033115885.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: SE27->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2016->geographic information of islateion: China: Anhui->host name: N/A->mlst type: N/A->serotype: N/A
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
{{{ Here_is_my_answer }}}

accession number: GCA_033115885.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: SE27->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2016->geographic information of isolation: China: Anhui->host name: missing->mlst type: N/A->serotype: N/A

{{{ I_finished_JB_155_xyz }}}
source 2:
------------------------------
```output
accession number: GCA_033115885.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: SE27->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2016 format->geographic information of islateion: China: Anhui->host name: vaccine->mlst type: N/A->serotype: N/A
```
source 3:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_033115885.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: SE27->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2016-01-01->geographic information of isolation: China: Anhui->host name: missing->mlst type: N/A->serotype: N/A

metadata is inconsist because:

- Source 0 and Source 1 indicate the host name as "N/A" and "missing," respectively, while Source 2 indicates "vaccine." 
- There is inconsistency in the spelling for "geographic information of isolation" between different sources. Source 0 and Source 2 use "geographic information of islateion," which appears to be a typo.

the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 4 different sources. The metadata from each source includes information after </output>
    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>

You must check if the metadata from 4 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output consist information below without explaining how to get such results:

    </output>
        accession number: xxx->species name: xxxx->strain name: xxxx->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: xxxx format->geographic information of islateion: xxxx->host name: xxxx->mlst type: xxxx->serotype: xxxx
    <output/>


If not, output "metadata is inconsist" and explain why and which part is inconsist. PS: 
    a. if species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    b. if isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    c. if geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    d. Also, ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
</output>
accession number: GCA_036620455.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: PV7573->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2022-11-18->geographic information of islateion: Italy->host name: Homo sapiens->mlst type: N/A->serotype: N/A
<output/>
source 1:
------------------------------
{{{ Here_is_my_answer }}}

accession number: GCA_036620455.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: PV7573->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2022-11-18->geographic information of isolation: Italy->host name: Homo sapiens->mlst type: N/A->serotype: N/A

{{{ I_finished_JB_156_xyz }}}
source 2:
------------------------------
<output>
accession number: GCA_036620455.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: PV7573->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2022-11-18 format->geographic information of islateion: Italy->host name: Homo sapiens->mlst type: N/A->serotype: N/A
<output/>
source 3:
------------------------------
accession number: GCA_036620455.1->species name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae->strain name: PV7573->isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd: 2022-11-18->geographic information of isolation: Italy, 45.20053905 N 9.14749247 E->host name: Homo sapiens->mlst type: N/A->serotype: N/A

metadata is inconsist: 
- The geographic information of isolation is inconsist: Source 3 includes coordinates in addition to Italy, which is more specific than the other sources.