Respan Dataset Explorer

System: I will provide you with a textual user review of an Android app, aiming to categorize the reviews into specific intention classes:
bug report: report a problem, such as faulty behavior of the application. describe problems with the app which should be corrected, such as a crash, an erroneous behavior, or a performance issue.
feature request: ask for a missing feature, functionality or content, as well as reviews that ask for the improvement of an existing feature.
other: users express general appreciation with the application. It focuses on general judgment. They are simple text reflections of the numeric star rating. Ratings are less informative as they only include praise, dispraise, a distractive critique, or a dissuasion. Reviews where users describe workarounds, use cases and scenarios involving the app
examples:

review: really disappointed with your customer services team. Ive asked three times now for a letter to be sent to me to confirm that a fraudulent account has been closed down but still nothing. Ask to speak to managers but theyre always in a meeting. #fraud #CustomerExperience
intention: bug report
review: I don't need a dm. Why don't your stores carry what I need for my phone?
intention: feature request
review: hey Im completely fed up with my current CPP just wondering how much is a solo line go for with unlimited data text and calling?
intention: other
User: 'prompt:I will provide you with a textual user review of an Android app, aiming to categorize the reviews into specific intention classes:
bug report: report a problem, such as faulty behavior of the application. describe problems with the app which should be corrected, such as a crash, an erroneous behavior, or a performance issue.
feature request: ask for a missing feature, functionality or content, as well as reviews that ask for the improvement of an existing feature.
other: users express general appreciation with the application. It focuses on general judgment. They are simple text reflections of the numeric star rating. Ratings are less informative as they only include praise, dispraise, a distractive critique, or a dissuasion. Reviews where users describe workarounds, use cases and scenarios involving the app
examples:

review: really disappointed with your customer services team. Ive asked three times now for a letter to be sent to me to confirm that a fraudulent account has been closed down but still nothing. Ask to speak to managers but theyre always in a meeting. #fraud #CustomerExperience
intention: bug report
review: I don't need a dm. Why don't your stores carry what I need for my phone?
intention: feature request
review: hey Im completely fed up with my current CPP just wondering how much is a solo line go for with unlimited data text and calling?
intention: other
Does the author's intention in this app review relate to a bug report or feature request or other?
review: How come you have stopped the Priority 1 book deal with Was great but now the 3.99 ones are terrible!'
intention: '
Assistant:

feature request

What feedback would you give on the following two paragraphs and especially the transitions between the two:
Our proposal (\citealp{Choshen2022FusingFM} and in parallel \citep{wortsman2022model,matena2021merging}) to combine several neural models into one is now called model merging. Merging is efficient and even in our state-of-the-art methods \citep{DBLP:conf/nips/YadavTCRB23,knots} requires just averaging and deleting model weights. While those are only preliminary steps in modular or collaborative pretraining methods (see \S\ref{sec:future}), model merging, became a whole research field of its own including hundreds of papers bringing deeper understanding of model weights and losses, \textbf{tens of thousands} of models made by the community. Model recycling \citep{DBLP:conf/emnlp/ChoshenVDSK23} branched to other subfields such as mixture of expert merging \citep{yadav2024survey}. All those efforts harness diversity for training and reduce compute. What about tapping into expertise for data?


For the public, LLMs are conversation agents. Still, until recently no \textbf{human-model interaction} data has been available.
Instead, we have studied image generation models, finding that humans adapt their own language to fit the model’s implicit expectations \citep{DBLP:conf/emnlp/Don-YehiyaCA22}. However, the lack of LLM chats for study was barring any real understanding of what these models are used for, what risks are induced by them, the effects of interaction on humans and models, and where they fail. Thus, we created a way for users to contribute their \href{https://sharelm.github.io/}{conversations}, and a \href{https://huggingface.co/datasets/shachardon/ShareLM}{pool} collecting data from this and other projects (currently sizing 3M+ chats, including my LLM-aided rephrases of this very sentence, \citealp{don2024sharelm}). With the data, we found that humans react to LLMs and give feedback, as they would with humans, despite the LLMs' inability to improve upon this feedback. We propose to harness this to develop interactive systems without explicit labeling \citep{DBLP:conf/emnlp/Don-YehiyaCA23}, this offers a cheap and sustainable alternative to manually collecting millions of human annotations \citep{dubey2024llama}. This, however, is just the beginning of open human feedback collection and use \citep{DonYehiya2024TheFO}, which is elaborated on in the future steps \S\ref{sec:future}.

The two paragraphs address distinct topics connected through the shared theme of advancements in AI research and practical implementations. Here are some feedback points and suggestions for improving clarity, coherence, and the transitions between these paragraphs:

1. **Clearer Transition:**
   - The transition between the paragraphs could be smoother. The first paragraph discusses the model merging field, focusing on computational efficiency and diversity in model training. The second paragraph abruptly shifts to discussing LLMs without a direct connection to the previous paragraph.
   - Suggestion: Provide a linking sentence that briefly mentions why transitioning from model merging to LLM-related human-model interaction is relevant. For example:
     - "While these innovations in model merging revolutionize model efficiency, understanding user interactions with these models is equally crucial."

2. **Contextual Relevance:**
   - Both paragraphs have research-heavy language and concepts. Ensure the reader can follow the shift from technical advancements in model design to the implications of human interaction with LLMs.
   - Suggestion: Emphasize the importance of understanding these models' real-world applications as a natural progression from model development to deployment.

3. **Consistency in Detail:**
   - While the first paragraph is highly technical and dense with references to various studies and methodologies, the second paragraph starts with a broader viewpoint. Align the depth of technical details or maintain a narrative flow that connects them.
   - Suggestion: You could start the second paragraph by discussing LLMs' role as a specific application of these advanced, merged models, thus ensuring continuity in detail.

4. **Use of Citations:**
   - The abundance of citations, especially in the first paragraph, might overwhelm or distract, breaking the narrative flow.
   - Suggestion: Integrate citations less disruptively by embedding them seamlessly into sentences or by grouping related works together.

5. **Explicit Connection to Future Directions:**
   - Both paragraphs reference future research steps but do so in isolation.
   - Suggestion: State a shared goal or overarching research direction for both areas early in the introduction that is revisited throughout the discussion.

6. **Rewrite the Final Sentences for Emphasis:**
   - The concluding thoughts of each paragraph are quite impactful but could be more cohesively emphasized.
   - Suggestion: Use conclusive sentences that tie back to a broader theme or question such as the dual role of efficiency and interactivity in future AI developments.

In summary, improving the transition between the paragraphs and ensuring that they are part of a coherent narrative will enhance the overall clarity and impact of the writing.

System: I will provide you with a textual user review of an Android app, aiming to categorize the reviews into specific intention classes:
bug report: report a problem, such as faulty behavior of the application. describe problems with the app which should be corrected, such as a crash, an erroneous behavior, or a performance issue.
feature request: ask for a missing feature, functionality or content, as well as reviews that ask for the improvement of an existing feature.
other: users express general appreciation with the application. It focuses on general judgment. They are simple text reflections of the numeric star rating. Ratings are less informative as they only include praise, dispraise, a distractive critique, or a dissuasion. Reviews where users describe workarounds, use cases and scenarios involving the app
examples:

review: really disappointed with your customer services team. Ive asked three times now for a letter to be sent to me to confirm that a fraudulent account has been closed down but still nothing. Ask to speak to managers but theyre always in a meeting. #fraud #CustomerExperience
intention: bug report
review: I don't need a dm. Why don't your stores carry what I need for my phone?
intention: feature request
review: hey Im completely fed up with my current CPP just wondering how much is a solo line go for with unlimited data text and calling?
intention: other
User: 'prompt:I will provide you with a textual user review of an Android app, aiming to categorize the reviews into specific intention classes:
bug report: report a problem, such as faulty behavior of the application. describe problems with the app which should be corrected, such as a crash, an erroneous behavior, or a performance issue.
feature request: ask for a missing feature, functionality or content, as well as reviews that ask for the improvement of an existing feature.
other: users express general appreciation with the application. It focuses on general judgment. They are simple text reflections of the numeric star rating. Ratings are less informative as they only include praise, dispraise, a distractive critique, or a dissuasion. Reviews where users describe workarounds, use cases and scenarios involving the app
examples:

review: really disappointed with your customer services team. Ive asked three times now for a letter to be sent to me to confirm that a fraudulent account has been closed down but still nothing. Ask to speak to managers but theyre always in a meeting. #fraud #CustomerExperience
intention: bug report
review: I don't need a dm. Why don't your stores carry what I need for my phone?
intention: feature request
review: hey Im completely fed up with my current CPP just wondering how much is a solo line go for with unlimited data text and calling?
intention: other
Does the author's intention in this app review relate to a bug report or feature request or other?
review: How do I claim, I upgraded last week'
intention: '
Assistant:

other

System: You are an expert Data Annotator. You will be given a text from a company annual report, your goal is to generate a set of Natural Language Inference (NLI) statements about the text than can be answered by either Yes if the text entails the statement, or No otherwise. Do not include any numerical reasoning or numbers in the statements.

Step 1: Read the paragraph carefully. 
Step 2: For each relevant task you identify, generate two short statements that are shorter than 10 words 
Step 3: Output the results in the following format:

Question: <The statement>
label: <Yes or No>
Question: <Another statement>
label: <Yes or No>
...

User: Workers' compensation, auto liability, employee health, and general liability insurance represent significant costs to us. Because we are significantly self-insured for workers' compensation, auto liability, employee health, and general liability risks, the amount of our insurance expense is dependent on claims experience, our ability to control our claims experience, and in the case of workers' compensation and employee health, rising health care costs in general. Unanticipated additional insurance costs could adversely impact our results of operations and cash flows, and the failure to obtain or maintain any necessary insurance coverage could have an adverse impact on us._
Assistant:

Question: Insurance costs are significant to the company.  
label: Yes  

Question: The company is fully insured for all liabilities.  
label: No  

Question: Rising health care costs affect expenses.  
label: Yes  

Question: Claims experience does not affect expenses.  
label: No  

Question: Insurance costs could impact cash flows negatively.  
label: Yes  

Question: Maintaining insurance coverage is not important.  
label: No  

System: 
User: Suppose you are a company from Switzerland and operating in the Energy. You are disclosing in section 1A Risk Factors about global economic risk.
    The disclosure should be in length between 100 and 200 words.
    The tone should be formal and pessimistic.

    Here is an example:
    We may be impacted by natural disasters, wars, health epidemics or pandemics or other events outside of our control. For example, Mountain Pass is located in San Bernardino County, California near active faults, which could lead to nearby earthquakes. If major disasters such as earthquakes, wild fires, health epidemics or pandemics, floods or other events occur, or our information system or communications network breaks down or operates improperly, our ability to continue operations at Mountain Pass may be seriously damaged, or we may have to stop or delay production and shipment of our products. We may incur expenses or delays relating to such events outside of our control, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, operating results and financial condition.
Assistant:

Global economic conditions present significant risks to our operations in the energy sector. Fluctuations in international markets, driven by factors such as rising inflation, fluctuating currency exchange rates, or political instability, can adversely affect our financial stability and strategic initiatives. As a Swiss company, our reliance on global supply chains for critical components and raw materials exposes us to disruptions caused by economic downturns, trade restrictions, or geopolitical tensions. Additionally, volatility in energy prices, driven by uncertain economic climates or shifting regulatory environments, could further strain our operational capabilities and profitability. Such economic uncertainties are beyond our control and may necessitate unanticipated adjustments in our business strategies or resource allocations. Consequently, these global economic risks could impair our financial performance, hinder our growth prospects, and potentially weaken our competitive position in the market.

System: 
User: Suppose you are a company from China and operating in the Software & Services. You are disclosing in section 7 Management's Discussion and Analysis about vendor concentration risk.
    The disclosure should be in length between 100 and 200 words.
    The tone should be formal and pessimistic.

    Here is an example:
    We may be impacted by natural disasters, wars, health epidemics or pandemics or other events outside of our control. For example, Mountain Pass is located in San Bernardino County, California near active faults, which could lead to nearby earthquakes. If major disasters such as earthquakes, wild fires, health epidemics or pandemics, floods or other events occur, or our information system or communications network breaks down or operates improperly, our ability to continue operations at Mountain Pass may be seriously damaged, or we may have to stop or delay production and shipment of our products. We may incur expenses or delays relating to such events outside of our control, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, operating results and financial condition.
Assistant:

Our operations in the Software & Services sector are subject to substantial vendor concentration risk, which may adversely affect our business continuity and financial performance. A significant portion of our software solutions and IT infrastructure depends heavily on a limited number of key vendors. Any disruptions in the supply chain or adverse changes in contractual agreements with these vendors could pose severe challenges. Furthermore, any financial instability, operational inefficiencies, or quality control issues faced by these vendors can directly impact our service delivery, leading to potential delays in project timelines, increased costs, and diminished customer satisfaction. This over-reliance on a few vendors significantly heightens our vulnerability to external shocks and may result in operational disruptions, thereby materially affecting our financial results and competitive standing in the industry.

Приает

Привет! Как я могу помочь вам сегодня?

System: You are an expert Data Annotator. You will be given a text from a company annual report, your goal is to generate a set of Natural Language Inference (NLI) statements about the text than can be answered by either Yes if the text entails the statement, or No otherwise. Do not include any numerical reasoning or numbers in the statements.

Step 1: Read the paragraph carefully. 
Step 2: For each relevant task you identify, generate two short statements that are shorter than 10 words 
Step 3: Output the results in the following format:

Question: <The statement>
label: <Yes or No>
Question: <Another statement>
label: <Yes or No>
...

User: While all of our businesses are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations, compliance with certain laws and regulations is most material with respect to our Cable Communications and broadcast television businesses in the United States. In addition, our international businesses are subject to various laws and regulations in the jurisdiction of the foreign regulatory authorities where they operate._Legislators and regulators at all levels of government frequently consider changing, and sometimes do change, existing statutes, rules or regulations, or interpretations of existing statutes, rules or regulations, or prescribe new ones, any of which may significantly affect our businesses and ability to effectively compete. These legislators and regulators have been active in considering legislation and rulemakings, at times looking to adopt regulatory approaches from different countries that may be more burdensome, and they, along with some state attorneys general and foreign governmental authorities, have also been active in conducting inquiries and reviews regarding our services. State legislative and regulatory initiatives can create a patchwork of different and/or conflicting state requirements, such as with respect to privacy and Open Internet/net neutrality regulations, that can affect our business operations and further constrain our ability to compete._
Assistant:

Question: Compliance is crucial for Cable Communications.
label: Yes

Question: International businesses follow US regulations.
label: No

Question: Legislators often consider changing regulations.
label: Yes

Question: State initiatives create uniform requirements.
label: No

Question: Privacy regulations can affect business operations.
label: Yes

Question: Only federal laws affect Cable Communications.
label: No

Travail à rendre N°1

Une résistance électrique de forme cylindrique (D = 0,4 cm, L = 1,5 cm) installée sur un circuit imprimé dissipe une puissance de 0,6 W. En supposant que la chaleur est transférée de manière uniforme à travers toutes les surfaces, déterminer :

1°/ La quantité de chaleur dissipée par cette résistance au cours d'une période d'une heure.

2°/ Le flux thermique ϕ(W) et la densité de flux thermique (W/m²).

3°/ Le flux de chaleur dissipée par les surfaces supérieure et inférieure.

4°/ La fraction de chaleur dissipée par les surfaces supérieure et inférieure. Conclure.

Pour résoudre ce problème, nous devons utiliser les concepts de transfert thermique et quelques formules géométriques basiques. Voici une approche détaillée :

### 1°/ Quantité de chaleur dissipée au cours d'une heure

La puissance dissipée par la résistance est donnée comme 0,6 W. La quantité de chaleur \( Q \) dissipée sur une période de temps \( t \) est donnée par la formule :

\[ Q = P \times t \]

où \( P \) est la puissance en watts et \( t \) est le temps en secondes. Ainsi, pour une période d'une heure (qui équivaut à 3600 secondes), la quantité de chaleur dissipée est :

\[ Q = 0,6 \, \text{W} \times 3600 \, \text{s} = 2160 \, \text{J} \]

### 2°/ Flux thermique \( \varphi \) et densité de flux thermique

#### Flux thermique \( \varphi \)

Le flux thermique est simplement la puissance transférée, donc :

\[ \varphi = 0,6 \, \text{W} \]

#### Densité de flux thermique

Pour trouver la densité de flux thermique (en W/m²), nous devons d'abord calculer la surface à travers laquelle la chaleur est dissipée. 

La résistance étant cylindrique, elle a une surface latérale ainsi que des surfaces supérieure et inférieure. 

- **Surface latérale :** La surface latérale d'un cylindre est donnée par la formule :

  \[ A_{\text{lat}} = \pi D L \]

  où \( D = 0,004 \, \text{m} \) (conversion de 0,4 cm) et \( L = 0,015 \, \text{m} \) (conversion de 1,5 cm).

  \[ A_{\text{lat}} = \pi \times 0,004 \, \text{m} \times 0,015 \, \text{m} = 1,884 \times 10^{-4} \, \text{m}^2 \]

- **Surfaces supérieure et inférieure :** La surface d'un disque est :

  \[ A_{\text{sup/inf}} = \pi \left(\frac{D}{2}\right)^2 = \pi \left(\frac{0,004}{2}\right)^2 = 1,256 \times 10^{-5} \, \text{m}^2 \]

  Parce qu'il y a deux de ces surfaces (supérieure et inférieure), on a :

  \[ A_{\text{sup\_inf\_total}} = 2 \times 1,256 \times 10^{-5} = 2,512 \times 10^{-5} \, \text{m}^2 \]

- **Surface totale :**

  \[ A_{\text{total}} = A_{\text{lat}} + A_{\text{sup\_inf\_total}} = 1,884 \times 10^{-4} + 2,512 \times 10^{-5} = 2,1352 \times 10^{-4} \, \text{m}^2 \]

Avec cette surface totale, la densité de flux thermique est :

\[ j = \frac{\varphi}{A_{\text{total}}} = \frac{0,6 \, \text{W}}{2,1352 \times 10^{-4} \, \text{m}^2} \approx 2809 \, \text{W/m}^2 \]

### 3°/ Flux de chaleur dissipée par les surfaces supérieure et inférieure

Le flux thermique par les surfaces supérieure et inférieure se base sur la proportion de la surface totale qu'elles occupent :

\[ \varphi_{\text{sup\_inf}} = \frac{A_{\text{sup\_inf\_total}}}{A_{\text{total}}} \times \varphi = \frac{2,512 \times 10^{-5}}{2,1352 \times 10^{-4}} \times 0,6 \]

\[ \varphi_{\text{sup\_inf}} \approx 0,0705 \, \text{W} \]

### 4°/ Fraction de chaleur dissipée par les surfaces supérieure et inférieure

La fraction de chaleur dissipée par les surfaces supérieure et inférieure est :

\[ \text{Fraction} = \frac{\varphi_{\text{sup\_inf}}}{\varphi} = \frac{0,0705}{0,6} \approx 0,1175 \]

### Conclusion

Environ 11,75% de la chaleur totale est dissipée par les surfaces supérieure et inférieure, tandis que le reste (environ 88,25%) est dissipé par la surface latérale du cylindre. Ceci montre que la majorité de la dissipation thermique se produit à travers la surface latérale dans ce problème de transfert thermique via un cylindre.

System: I will provide you with a textual user review of an Android app, aiming to categorize the reviews into specific intention classes:
bug report: report a problem, such as faulty behavior of the application. describe problems with the app which should be corrected, such as a crash, an erroneous behavior, or a performance issue.
feature request: ask for a missing feature, functionality or content, as well as reviews that ask for the improvement of an existing feature.
other: users express general appreciation with the application. It focuses on general judgment. They are simple text reflections of the numeric star rating. Ratings are less informative as they only include praise, dispraise, a distractive critique, or a dissuasion. Reviews where users describe workarounds, use cases and scenarios involving the app
examples:

review: really disappointed with your customer services team. Ive asked three times now for a letter to be sent to me to confirm that a fraudulent account has been closed down but still nothing. Ask to speak to managers but theyre always in a meeting. #fraud #CustomerExperience
intention: bug report
review: I don't need a dm. Why don't your stores carry what I need for my phone?
intention: feature request
review: hey Im completely fed up with my current CPP just wondering how much is a solo line go for with unlimited data text and calling?
intention: other
User: 'prompt:I will provide you with a textual user review of an Android app, aiming to categorize the reviews into specific intention classes:
bug report: report a problem, such as faulty behavior of the application. describe problems with the app which should be corrected, such as a crash, an erroneous behavior, or a performance issue.
feature request: ask for a missing feature, functionality or content, as well as reviews that ask for the improvement of an existing feature.
other: users express general appreciation with the application. It focuses on general judgment. They are simple text reflections of the numeric star rating. Ratings are less informative as they only include praise, dispraise, a distractive critique, or a dissuasion. Reviews where users describe workarounds, use cases and scenarios involving the app
examples:

review: really disappointed with your customer services team. Ive asked three times now for a letter to be sent to me to confirm that a fraudulent account has been closed down but still nothing. Ask to speak to managers but theyre always in a meeting. #fraud #CustomerExperience
intention: bug report
review: I don't need a dm. Why don't your stores carry what I need for my phone?
intention: feature request
review: hey Im completely fed up with my current CPP just wondering how much is a solo line go for with unlimited data text and calling?
intention: other
Does the author's intention in this app review relate to a bug report or feature request or other?
review: How do I get my unique code to text to you?'
intention: '
Assistant:

other